Pile damage prevention and assessment using dynamic monitoring and the beta method

被引:0
作者
Likins, Garland [1 ]
Rausche, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Pile Dynamics, Inc., Cleveland, OH 44139
来源
| 2014年 / American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), United States卷
关键词
D O I
10.1061/9780784413265.034
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Driven piles are subjected to high stresses during installation. It is, therefore, important not to exceed acceptable stresses along the pile shaft and at the toe to prevent damage. Dynamic monitoring has been used for decades to evaluate not only the installation stresses, but also to check test piles for signs of structural damage. The Beta Method (β-Method) for evaluation of the location and extent of a potential damage was developed more than 30 years ago and has proven effective as a QC and QA tool. As an aid in the process of pile rejection or acceptance, the β-method also offers a rating scale that translates the automatically determined β-number into a helpful pile integrity assessment tool. The reliability of this algorithm has been proven by numerous extracted piles. However, one limitation of the β-method concerned detection of damage near the pile toe where high toe resistance effects and/or stress wave reflections reduce the effectiveness of the traditional β-method. In the past, therefore, near-toe damage was determined by the testing engineer, not only by visual inspection of the dynamic monitoring data, but also by reviewing the pile toe compressive stresses throughout the monitored driving history and the strength and stiffness of the soil response from the pile toe. This approach has now been automated and subjected to tests on existing data. After a review of the existing methods of pile stress and damage calculations, the paper presents the new method, illustrating its effectiveness by examples from measurements on both concrete and steel piles. © 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 442
页数:14
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, (2010)
[2]  
Goble G.G., Likins G.E., Rausche F., Bearing Capacity of Piles from Dynamic Measurements, (1975)
[3]  
Goble G.G., Likins G.E., Teferra W., Piles and Pile Driving Hammer Performance for H-Piles Driven to Bedrock, (1977)
[4]  
Goble G., Hussein M.H., Dynamic pile testing in practice, Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, pp. 713-716, (1994)
[5]  
Hussein M.H., Morgano C.M., Structural integrity evaluation of concrete piles from stress wave measurements, Society for Experimental Mechanics, Conf. on Nondestructive Testing of Concrete in the Infrastructure, (1993)
[6]  
Likins G.E., Rausche F., Correlation of capwap with static load tests, Int. Conf. on the Application of Stresswave Theory to Piles, pp. 153-165, (2004)
[7]  
Rausche F., Goble G.G., Determination of Pile Damage by Top Measurements, pp. 500-506, (1979)
[8]  
Rausche F., Goble G., Likins G., Miner R., The Performance of Pile Driving Systems, (1985)
[9]  
Rausche F., Likins G.E., Hussein M.H., Pile integrity by low and high strain impacts, Int. Conf. on the Application of Stress Wave Theory to Pile. Ottawa, Canada, pp. 44-55, (1988)
[10]  
Rausche F., Moses F., Goble G.G., Soil resistance predictions from pile dynamics, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, American Society of Civil Engineers., 98, (1972)