Development and Verification of Typical PWR Core Physical and Thermal-hydraulic Steady Coupling Code

被引:0
|
作者
Li Z. [1 ,2 ]
An P. [1 ,2 ]
Pan J. [1 ,2 ]
Lu C. [1 ,2 ]
Lu W. [1 ,2 ]
Yang H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nuclear Power Institute of China, Chengdu
[2] Science and Technology on Reactor System Design Technology Laboratory, Chengdu
来源
Lu, Wei (luwei9s@163.com) | 1600年 / Atomic Energy Press卷 / 55期
关键词
Cylinder heat conduction model; Physical and thermal-hydraulic coupling; PWR core; Steady;
D O I
10.7538/yzk.2020.youxian.0296
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to more accurately simulate the strong neutronics physical and thermal-hydraulic coupling phenomenon in a typical PWR, ARMcc, a software for the physical and thermal-hydraulic coupling calculation of PWR core, was developed. In the ARMcc program, the physical calculation module is based on the fourth-order nodal expansion method (NEM) and Nodal Green's function method (NGFM), the thermal-hydraulic calculation module is based on one-dimensional single-phase single-channel heat transfer model and one-dimensional cylinder heat conduction calculation model. The finite volume method and finite difference method were used to solve heat conduction model in ARMcc program. Based on the typical PWR benchmark NEACRP-L-335, the ability of steady-state coupling calculation of the program was verified. The key parameters of the program, such as critical boron concentration and core Doppler temperature, are in good agreement with reference results. The relative deviation between the critical boron concentration and the reference results is less than 0.5%. In addition, the influences of the finite volume method and the finite difference method on the results of the coupling program were studied. The PARCS program was selected as the comparison program. It is found that NGFM+DIF mode can more accurately simulate the core fuel Doppler temperature and core power distribution, NGFM+VOL mode can more accurately simulate the critical boron concentration, and NEM+VOL mode can more accurately simulate the core fuel maximum temperature. © 2021, Editorial Board of Atomic Energy Science and Technology. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 692
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] (2004)
  • [2] BERRILL M, CLARNO K, HAMILTON S, Et al., Evaluation of coupling aproaches, CASL-8-2014-0081-000, (2014)
  • [3] KNOLL D A, KEYES D E., Jacobian-free Newton-Krylov methods: A survey of approaches and applications, Journal of Computational Physics, 193, pp. 357-397, (2004)
  • [4] SALAH A B, VEDOVI J, D'AURIA F, Et al., Analysis of the VVER1000 coolant trip benchmark using the coupled RELAP5/PARCS code, Progress in Nuclear Energy, 48, pp. 806-819, (2006)
  • [5] AN Ping, LIU Dong, PAN Junjie, Et al., Development of steady reactor core multi-physics coupling system CSSS V1. 0, Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 53, 5, pp. 863-868, (2019)
  • [6] KOZMENKOV Y, KLIME S, GRUNDMANN U, Et al., Calculation of the VVER-1000 coolant transient benchmark using the coupled code systems DYN3D/RELAP5 and DYN3D/ATHLET, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 237, pp. 1938-1951, (2007)
  • [7] LIU Yu, LI Feng, ZHANG Hong, Et al., Verification of three dimensional neutronics and thermal-hydraulic coupled code with RIA benchmarks, Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 44, 11, pp. 1328-1334, (2010)
  • [8] OKUMURA K., MOSRA-Light: High speed three-dimensional nodal diffusion code for vector computers, JAERI-Data/Code 98-025, (1998)
  • [9] (2015)
  • [10] (1979)