Global sensitivity analysis of parameters in DRAINMOD-S

被引:0
作者
Yu, Shuang'en [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Ning [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Zhiheng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jun [3 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Efficient Irrigation-Drainage and Agricutural Soil-Water Environment in Southern China, Ministry of Education, Nanjing
[2] College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower, Hohai University, Nanjing
[3] Anhui Survey and Design Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydropower, Hefei
来源
Shuikexue Jinzhan/Advances in Water Science | 2015年 / 26卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
DRAINMOD-S; Morris screening method; Parameter calibration; Sensitivity analysis;
D O I
10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2015.02.018
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to efficiently select the optimized parameters in DRAINMOD-S and figure out how the parametric variation influences the simulation results, sensitivity analysis of the parameters in the model was performed. Taking the pipe drainage desalting test as an example, which was conducted in Nantong Kowloon Reclamation Area, the Morris global qualitative sensitivity analysis was adopted to detect the the parameters sensitivity simulated in DRAINMOD-S of soil salinity in the profile against six parameters, namely, lateral saturated hydraulic conductivity Ksat, hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient D, maximum depth of surface water Sm, actual distance from surface to impermeable layer Im, drainage coefficient Dr and initial groundwater depth W. The results showed that Ksat has remarkable influence on simulation followed by D, Sm, Dr, while W and Im have little influence; nonlinear interactions among the parameters are different, and Ksat is the most significant. To guarantee the quality of the model simulation, accuracies of on-site measurement should be improved for the sensitive parameters and more emphases should be put on the sensitive parameters during the modelling. Meanwhile, the parameters which have strong nonlinear interaction should not be ignored. Therefore, model parameter calibration can be guided efficiently, and the applicability of the model will be improved. ©, 2015, China Water Power Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 278
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Xu C., Hu Y., Chang Y., Et al., Sensitivity analysis in ecological modeling, Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 15, 6, pp. 1056-1062, (2004)
[2]  
Mckay M.D., Beckman R.J., Conover W.J., A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics, 21, 4, pp. 239-245, (1979)
[3]  
Morris M.D., Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments, Technometrics, 33, 2, pp. 161-174, (1991)
[4]  
Cukier R.I., Fortuin C.M., Shuler K.E., Et al., Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients: I: Theory, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 59, 3, pp. 3873-3878, (1973)
[5]  
Sobol I.M., Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models, Mathematical Modelling Computational Experiments, 1, 4, pp. 407-414, (1993)
[6]  
Saltelli A., Tarantola S., Chan K., A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output, Technometrics, 41, 1, pp. 39-56, (1999)
[7]  
Song X., Kong F., Zhan C., Et al., Sensitivity analysis of hydrological model parameters using a statistical theory approach, Advances in Water Science, 23, 5, pp. 642-649, (2012)
[8]  
Eline V., Dirk R., Patrick W., Global sensitivity analysis of yield output from the water productivity model, Environmental Modelling & Software, 51, pp. 323-332, (2014)
[9]  
Lu C., Shu L., Liu L., Et al., Adaptability evaluation of numerical simulation accuracy of groundwater based on sensitivity analysis, Journal of Hohai University: Natural Sciences, 38, 1, pp. 26-30, (2010)
[10]  
Brown R.A., Skaggs R.W., Hunt W.F., Calibration and validation of DRAINMOD to model bioretention hydrology, Journal of Hydrology, 486, pp. 430-442, (2013)