Exoskeletons vs. exosuits: A comparative analysis using biological-based computer simulation

被引:0
|
作者
Bermejo-García J. [1 ]
Romero-Sánchez F. [1 ]
Agujetas R. [1 ]
Sánchez F.J.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Universidad de Extremadura, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Energy and Materials, Av. de Elvas s/n, Badajoz
关键词
Exoskeleton; Exosuit assistive device; Human gait; Musculoskeletal; Simulations;
D O I
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108752
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Interest in the design of gait assistance devices has experienced significant growth in recent years. Among various uses of assistive devices, those aimed at supporting the elderly have gained importance due to the rising population of this age group. Methods: This study aims to compare the efficacy of two types of assistive devices through musculoskeletal simulations. One case is an ideal device, simulating the motor actuation as it would be in a rigid exoskeleton, and, cable-assisted devices, simulating the assistance of an exosuit. The simulations were based on data obtained from 9 subjects. OpenSim, an open-source software, was employed to conduct the simulations. Results: Our findings indicate that the cable-assisted device outperforms the traditional exoskeleton by achieving a more significant reduction in the metabolic cost with relatively lower assistance power. Conclusion: Cable-assisted gait assistance devices have shown comparable results to traditional exoskeletons, with the added advantage of improved performance through reduced power requirements. © 2024
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benchmarking analysis for biological-based metaheuristics
    Garcia-Gonzalez, Enol
    Villar-Flecha, Jose-Ramon
    Sedano, Javier
    Chira, Camelia
    DYNA, 2024, 99 (03): : 296 - 302
  • [2] Molecular vs. biological structure. A comparative analysis
    Bonchev, D. G.
    RECENT PROGRESS IN COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, VOLS 7A AND 7B, 2006, 7A-B : 1378 - 1381
  • [3] SIMULATION-BASED DESIGN OF EXOSKELETONS USING MUSCULOSKELETAL ANALYSIS
    Agarwal, Priyanshu
    Narayanan, Madusudanan S.
    Lee, Leng-Feng
    Mendel, Frank
    Krovi, Venkat N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, DETC 2010, VOL 3, A AND B, 2010, : 1357 - 1364
  • [4] Engineering Biological-Based Vascular Grafts Using a Pulsatile Bioreactor
    Huang, Angela H.
    Niklason, Laura E.
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2011, (52):
  • [5] ANTIBODY ANALYSIS: HUMAN VS. COMPUTER
    Rife, Amy L.
    Vega, Renato M.
    Zachary, Andrea A.
    Leffell, Mary S.
    HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 70 : S38 - S38
  • [6] Exercises with computer vs. Exercises in paper: a comparative study
    Trejos Buritica, Omar Ivan
    ACADEMIA Y VIRTUALIDAD, 2018, 11 (01):
  • [7] Biological-Based Produced Water Treatment Using Microalgae: Challenges and Efficiency
    Alsarayreh, Malak
    Almomani, Fares
    Khraisheh, Majeda
    Nasser, Mustafa S.
    Soliman, Yousria
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [8] A comparative analysis of renewable energy simulation tools: Performance simulation model vs. system optimization
    Tozzi, Peter, Jr.
    Jo, Jin Ho
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 80 : 390 - 398
  • [9] Comparative Performance of Chemical and Biological-based Products in Management of Algal Leaf Spot on Magnolia
    Baysal-Gurel, Fulya
    Bika, Ravi
    Jennings, Christina
    Palmer, Cristi
    Simmons, Terri
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 30 (06) : 733 - 740
  • [10] Comparative analysis of Cypass vs. iStent
    Zlojutro, Paul Anthony
    Syeda, Sarah
    Kim, Chaesik
    Hughes, Bret
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)