Laser Diffraction as An Innovative Alternative to Standard Pipette Method for Determination of Soil Texture Classes in Central Europe

被引:22
作者
Igaz, Dusan [1 ]
Aydin, Elena [1 ]
Sinkovicova, Miroslava [1 ]
Simansky, Vladimir [2 ]
Tall, Andrej [3 ]
Horak, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Slovak Univ Agr, Dept Biometeorol & Hydrol, Nitra 94976, Slovakia
[2] Slovak Univ Agr, Dept Soil Sci, Nitra 94901, Slovakia
[3] Slovak Acad Sci, Inst Hydrol, Bratislava 84104, Slovakia
关键词
pipette method; laser diffraction; Analysette22 MicroTec plus; Mastersizer2000; particle size fractions; sample preparation; PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION; DIFFRACTOMETRY;
D O I
10.3390/w12051232
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The paper presents the comparison of soil particle size distribution determined by standard pipette method and laser diffraction. Based on the obtained results (542 soil samples from 271 sites located in the Nitra, Vah and Hron River basins), regression models were calculated to convert the results of the particle size distribution by laser diffraction to pipette method. Considering one of the most common soil texture classification systems used in Slovakia (according to Novak), the emphasis was placed on the determination accuracy of particle size fraction <0.01 mm. Analysette22 MicroTec plus and Mastersizer2000 devices were used for laser diffraction. Polynomial regression model resulted in the best approximation of measurements by laser diffraction to values obtained by pipette method. In the case of particle size fraction <0.01 mm, the differences between the measured values by pipette method and both laser analyzers ranged in average from 3% up to 9% and from 2% up to 11% in the case of Analysette22 and Mastersizer2000, respectively. After correction, the differences decreased to average 3.28% (Analysette22) and 2.24% (Mastersizer2000) in comparison with pipette method. After recalculation of the data, laser diffraction can be used alongside the sedimentation methods.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 59 条
[21]  
Ilavska B, 2001, VYUITIE UDAJOV VUPOP
[22]  
IUSS Working Group WRB, 2015, WORLD SOIL RESOURCES
[23]  
Jena R.K., 2013, Indian Journal of Hill Farming, V26, P78
[24]   Problems with determining the particle size distribution of chalk soil and some of their implications [J].
Kerry, R. ;
Rawlins, B. G. ;
Oliver, M. A. ;
Lacinska, A. M. .
GEODERMA, 2009, 152 (3-4) :324-337
[25]  
Kondrlova E, 2012, P LAND DEGR CHALL SU, P432
[26]  
Kondrlova E., 2015, J EGE U FAC AGR, P21
[27]  
KONDRLOVA E, 2013, MAT METHODS TECHNOL, V7, P492
[28]  
Kondrlova E, 2012, ACTA HORTIC REGIOTEC, V15, P27
[29]   Comparison of laser grain size analysis with pipette and sieve analysis: A solution for the underestimation of the clay fraction [J].
Konert, M ;
Vandenberghe, J .
SEDIMENTOLOGY, 1997, 44 (03) :523-535
[30]   Inherent factors limiting the use of laser diffraction for determining particle size distributions of soil and related samples [J].
Kowalenko, C. G. ;
Babuin, D. .
GEODERMA, 2013, 193 :22-28