Classifier selection for majority voting

被引:405
作者
Ruta, Dymitr [1 ]
Gabrys, Bogdan [2 ]
机构
[1] Computational Intelligence Group, BT Exact Technologies, Orion Building, Martlesham Heath, Ipswich IP5 3 RE, pp12, Adastral Park
[2] Compl. Intelligence Research Group, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus
关键词
Classifier fusion; Classifier selection; Diversity; Generalisation; Majority voting; Search algorithms;
D O I
10.1016/j.inffus.2004.04.008
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Individual classification models are recently challenged by combined pattern recognition systems, which often show better performance. In such systems the optimal set of classifiers is first selected and then combined by a specific fusion method. For a small number of classifiers optimal ensembles can be found exhaustively, but the burden of exponential complexity of such search limits its practical applicability for larger systems. As a result, simpler search algorithms and/or selection criteria are needed to reduce the complexity. This work provides a revision of the classifier selection methodology and evaluates the practical applicability of diversity measures in the context of combining classifiers by majority voting. A number of search algorithms are proposed and adjusted to work properly with a number of selection criteria including majority voting error and various diversity measures. Extensive experiments carried out with 15 classifiers on 27 datasets indicate inappropriateness of diversity measures used as selection criteria in favour of the direct combiner error based search. Furthermore, the results prompted a novel design of multiple classifier systems in which selection and fusion are recurrently applied to a population of best combinations of classifiers rather than the individual best. The improvement of the generalisation performance of such system is demonstrated experimentally. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 81
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   The Epistemic Edge of Majority Voting Over Lottery Voting [J].
Allard-Tremblay, Yann .
RES PUBLICA-A JOURNAL OF MORAL LEGAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, 2012, 18 (03) :207-223
[22]   Majority voting with bribes does not eliminate voting cycles [J].
Pun, WC .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL POLITICS, 1997, 9 (01) :131-134
[23]   A Framework for Malicious Domain Names Detection Using Feature Selection and Majority Voting Approach [J].
Patil, Dharmaraj R. .
Informatica (Slovenia), 2024, 48 (03) :419-438
[24]   A New Model for Measuring the Accuracies of Majority Voting Ensembles [J].
Wang, Xueyi .
2012 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2012,
[25]   Choosing a Committee Under Majority Voting [J].
Aslan, Fatma ;
Dindar, Hayrullah ;
Laine, Jean .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION: BEHAVIOR, MODELS, AND SUPPORT, GDN 2019, 2019, 351 :33-42
[26]   The Gini coefficient: Majority voting and social welfare [J].
Gabriel Rodriguez, Juan ;
Salas, Rafael .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2014, 152 :214-223
[27]   Majority voting and the welfare implications of tax avoidance [J].
Traxler, Christian .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2012, 96 (1-2) :1-9
[28]   Urdu Text Classification using Majority Voting [J].
Usman, Muhammad ;
Shafique, Zunaira ;
Ayub, Saba ;
Malik, Kamran .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2016, 7 (08) :265-273
[29]   Paimprint Verification Using SIFT Majority Voting [J].
Abeysundera, H. Pasindu ;
Eskil, M. Taner .
COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES II, 2012, :291-297
[30]   Intuitions about the epistemic virtues of majority voting [J].
Mercier, Hugo ;
Dockendorff, Martin ;
Majima, Yoshimasa ;
Hacquin, Anne-Sophie ;
Schwartzberg, Melissa .
THINKING & REASONING, 2021, 27 (03) :445-463