Classifier selection for majority voting

被引:393
|
作者
Ruta, Dymitr [1 ]
Gabrys, Bogdan [2 ]
机构
[1] Computational Intelligence Group, BT Exact Technologies, Orion Building, Martlesham Heath, Ipswich IP5 3 RE, pp12, Adastral Park
[2] Compl. Intelligence Research Group, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus
关键词
Classifier fusion; Classifier selection; Diversity; Generalisation; Majority voting; Search algorithms;
D O I
10.1016/j.inffus.2004.04.008
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Individual classification models are recently challenged by combined pattern recognition systems, which often show better performance. In such systems the optimal set of classifiers is first selected and then combined by a specific fusion method. For a small number of classifiers optimal ensembles can be found exhaustively, but the burden of exponential complexity of such search limits its practical applicability for larger systems. As a result, simpler search algorithms and/or selection criteria are needed to reduce the complexity. This work provides a revision of the classifier selection methodology and evaluates the practical applicability of diversity measures in the context of combining classifiers by majority voting. A number of search algorithms are proposed and adjusted to work properly with a number of selection criteria including majority voting error and various diversity measures. Extensive experiments carried out with 15 classifiers on 27 datasets indicate inappropriateness of diversity measures used as selection criteria in favour of the direct combiner error based search. Furthermore, the results prompted a novel design of multiple classifier systems in which selection and fusion are recurrently applied to a population of best combinations of classifiers rather than the individual best. The improvement of the generalisation performance of such system is demonstrated experimentally. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 81
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A multi-classifier system for automatic fingerprint classification using transfer learning and majority voting
    Walhazi, Hajer
    Maalej, Ahmed
    Ben Amara, Najoua Essoukri
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 83 (2) : 6113 - 6136
  • [12] Mutual neighborhood and modified majority voting based KNN classifier for multi-categories classification
    Hajizadeh, Rassoul
    Aghagolzadeh, Ali
    Ezoji, Mehdi
    PATTERN ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 25 (04) : 773 - 793
  • [13] A multi-classifier system for automatic fingerprint classification using transfer learning and majority voting
    Hajer Walhazi
    Ahmed Maalej
    Najoua Essoukri Ben Amara
    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2024, 83 : 6113 - 6136
  • [14] Prediction of Cancer Class with Majority Voting Genetic Programming Classifier Using Gene Expression Data
    Paul, Topon Kumar
    Iba, Hitoshi
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2009, 6 (02) : 353 - 367
  • [15] Mutual neighborhood and modified majority voting based KNN classifier for multi-categories classification
    Rassoul Hajizadeh
    Ali Aghagolzadeh
    Mehdi Ezoji
    Pattern Analysis and Applications, 2022, 25 : 773 - 793
  • [16] Limits on the majority vote accuracy in classifier fusion
    Kuncheva, LI
    Whitaker, CJ
    Shipp, CA
    Duin, RPW
    PATTERN ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 2003, 6 (01) : 22 - 31
  • [17] Majority voting leads to unanimity
    Geir B. Asheim
    Carl Andreas Claussen
    Tore Nilssen
    International Journal of Game Theory, 2006, 35 : 91 - 110
  • [18] Majority voting with bribes does not eliminate voting cycles
    Pun, WC
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL POLITICS, 1997, 9 (01) : 131 - 134
  • [19] Majority voting leads to unanimity
    Asheim, Geir B.
    Claussen, Carl Andreas
    Nilssen, Tore
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GAME THEORY, 2006, 35 (01) : 91 - 110
  • [20] Price discrimination and majority voting
    Laffont, JJ
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2002, 76 (02) : 173 - 178