Classifier selection for majority voting

被引:393
|
作者
Ruta, Dymitr [1 ]
Gabrys, Bogdan [2 ]
机构
[1] Computational Intelligence Group, BT Exact Technologies, Orion Building, Martlesham Heath, Ipswich IP5 3 RE, pp12, Adastral Park
[2] Compl. Intelligence Research Group, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus
关键词
Classifier fusion; Classifier selection; Diversity; Generalisation; Majority voting; Search algorithms;
D O I
10.1016/j.inffus.2004.04.008
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Individual classification models are recently challenged by combined pattern recognition systems, which often show better performance. In such systems the optimal set of classifiers is first selected and then combined by a specific fusion method. For a small number of classifiers optimal ensembles can be found exhaustively, but the burden of exponential complexity of such search limits its practical applicability for larger systems. As a result, simpler search algorithms and/or selection criteria are needed to reduce the complexity. This work provides a revision of the classifier selection methodology and evaluates the practical applicability of diversity measures in the context of combining classifiers by majority voting. A number of search algorithms are proposed and adjusted to work properly with a number of selection criteria including majority voting error and various diversity measures. Extensive experiments carried out with 15 classifiers on 27 datasets indicate inappropriateness of diversity measures used as selection criteria in favour of the direct combiner error based search. Furthermore, the results prompted a novel design of multiple classifier systems in which selection and fusion are recurrently applied to a population of best combinations of classifiers rather than the individual best. The improvement of the generalisation performance of such system is demonstrated experimentally. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 81
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of classifier combining based on majority voting
    Peng Hong
    Lin Chengde
    Luo Linkai
    Zhou Qifeng
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-7, 2007, : 768 - 772
  • [2] A theoretical analysis of the limits of Majority Voting errors for Multiple Classifier Systems
    Ruta, D
    Gabrys, B
    PATTERN ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 2002, 5 (04) : 333 - 350
  • [3] Unconstrained Handwritten Numeral Recognition Using Majority Voting Classifier
    Kumar, Rajiv
    Ahmed, Pervez
    Goyal, Mayank Kumar
    Kumar, Amresh
    2012 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PARALLEL, DISTRIBUTED AND GRID COMPUTING (PDGC), 2012, : 284 - 289
  • [4] Tag SNP selection using clonal selection and majority voting algorithms
    Ilhan, Ilhan
    Tezel, Gulay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DATA MINING AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 16 (04) : 290 - 311
  • [5] Multiple classifier combination for character recognition: Revisiting the majority voting system and its variations
    Rahman, AFR
    Alam, H
    Fairhurst, MC
    DOCUMENT ANALYSIS SYSTEM V, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 2423 : 167 - 178
  • [6] Majority Voting and Feature Selection Based Network Intrusion Detection System
    Patil, Dharmaraj R.
    Pattewar, Tareek M.
    EAI ENDORSED TRANSACTIONS ON SCALABLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 9 (06):
  • [7] Logic and Majority Voting
    Takemura, Ryo
    JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC, 2022, 51 (02) : 347 - 382
  • [8] Logic and Majority Voting
    Ryo Takemura
    Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2022, 51 : 347 - 382
  • [9] Majority voting on orders
    Gilbert Laffond
    Jean Lainé
    Theory and Decision, 2000, 49 (3) : 249 - 287
  • [10] Majority voting on orders
    Laffond, G
    Lainé, J
    THEORY AND DECISION, 2000, 49 (03) : 251 - 289