Vietnamese University Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT for Homework Assistance

被引:0
作者
Le, Mai Thi Truc [1 ]
Van Tran, Khue [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of English, FPT University, Can Tho
关键词
AI tool; ChatGPT; higher education; intention; perception;
D O I
10.3991/ijim.v18i15.48819
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Since its emergence, the novel ChatGPT has attracted lots of users. In education, the use of Chat GPT might provide both advantages and disadvantages for students. Likewise, the intention to use ChatGPT for learning is controversial in different contexts. In some contexts, students perceived ChatGPT as useful and easy to use, expressing their inclination to use this learning tool. Meanwhile, in other contexts, students were doubtful about ChatGPT’s benefits, leaning toward not using the tool for their learning. Therefore, it is worth gaining insight into students’ perceptions of ChatGPT in the current context. Drawing from the technology acceptance model (TAM), we explored how students perceived ChatGPT for their homework assignments. Data from mixed methods revealed that students have a moderately positive perception of using ChatGPT. Specifically, students have a positive attitude toward the use of ChatGPT and perceive it as useful and easy to use. More importantly, students have the intention of employing this tool for their future learning, despite several concerns. Data from structural equation modeling analyses demonstrated that perceived ease of use directly influences perceived usefulness. Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are predictors of students’ attitudes, which directly affect students’ intentions to use ChatGPT. The study provides empirical evidence to support the use of ChatGPT in education. Recommendations for using ChatGPT are discussed. © 2024 by the authors of this article.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 204
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mohr S., Kuhl R., Acceptance of artificial intelligence in German agriculture: An application of the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior, Precision Agric, 22, pp. 1816-1844, (2021)
  • [42] Maheshwari G., Factors influencing students’ intention to adopt and use ChatGPT in higher education: A study in the Vietnamese context, Educ. Inf. Technol, (2023)
  • [43] Creswell J. W., Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, (2009)
  • [44] Gay L. R., Mills G. E., Airasian P. W., Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications, (2012)
  • [45] Denscombe M., The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects, (2010)
  • [46] Creswell J. D., Creswell J. W., Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, (2018)
  • [47] Braun V., Clarke V., Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2, pp. 77-101, (2006)
  • [48] Hair J. F., Black W. C., Babin B. J., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Multivariate Data Analysis, (2019)
  • [49] Henseler J., Ringle C. M., Sarstedt M., A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, pp. 115-135, (2015)
  • [50] Pekruna R., Commentary: Self-report is indispensable to assess students’ learning, Frontline Learning Research, 8, 3, pp. 185-193, (2020)