Steering performance of underwater glider in water column monitoring

被引:1
|
作者
Zhu Y.-S. [1 ]
Yang C.-J. [1 ]
Wu S.-J. [1 ]
Xu X.-L. [1 ]
Zhou P.-Z. [1 ]
Shan X. [1 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou
来源
Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Gongxue Ban)/Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science) | 2016年 / 50卷 / 09期
关键词
Hydrodynamics; Large attack angle; Steering performance; Underwater glider; Water column monitoring;
D O I
10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2016.09.01
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
An underwater glider was presented for water column monitoring, which could adjust its pitch angle within a large range. The underwater glider could realize both normal gliding and vertical profile monitoring by using a gravity center adjustment module with multiple degrees of freedom. Research was conducted to enhance the steering efficiency for the underwater glider and enlarge the spacing between different water column checkpoints. An amended hydrodynamic model for large range attack angles was presented. Hydrodynamic coefficients computation, motion simulations, and a lake trial were conducted to analyze how the position of the wing and the steering pitch angle influenced the steering process. The results of the simulations and the lake trial show that enlarging the distance between the wing and the tail, and decreasing the steering pitch angle can reduce the steering radius, enhance the steering ratio, and enhance the horizontal deviation distance on the desired orientation. The lake trial shows that steering with the optimal pitch angle at 5° decreases the steering radius by 66%, increases the steering ratio by 330%, and increases the desired deviation distance by 77% over steering with a normal pitch angle at 27°. © 2016, Zhejiang University Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1637 / 1645
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] He R., Wooller M.J., Pohlman J.W., Et al., Diversity of active aerobic methanotrophs along depth profiles of arctic and subarctic lake water column and sediments, The ISME Journal, 6, 10, pp. 1937-1948, (2012)
  • [2] Weng Y., Yang H., He J., Et al., Microstructure measurement form an underwater glider: motion analysis and experimental results, OCEANS 2015, pp. 1-5, (2015)
  • [3] Sun F., Zheng Z.-M., Lu K.-H., Et al., Microbe activities in the sediment and its influences on N, P distribution of algae bloom water column and interstitial waters, Ecological Science, 30, 3, pp. 217-222, (2011)
  • [4] Garner S.B., Patterson W.F., Porch C.E., Et al., Experimental assessment of circle hook performance and selectivity in the northern gulf of mexico recreational reef fish fishery, Marine and Coastal Fisheries Dynamics Management and Ecosystem Science, 6, 1, pp. 235-246, (2014)
  • [5] Dunbabin M., Grinham A., Experimental evaluation of an autonomous surface vehicle for water quality and greenhouse gas emission monitoring, IEEE 2010 International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 5268-5274, (2010)
  • [6] Fan S.S., Yang C.J., Peng S.L., Et al., Underwater glider design based on dynamic model analysis and prototype development, Journal of Zhejiang University: Science C, 14, 8, pp. 583-599, (2013)
  • [7] Cao J., Cao J., Yao B., Et al., Three dimensional model, hydrodynamics analysis and motion simulation of an underwater glider, OCEANS 2015, pp. 1-8, (2015)
  • [8] Zhang F., Zhang F., Tan X., Tail-enabled spiraling maneuver for gliding robotic fish, Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control, 136, 4, pp. 112-120, (2014)
  • [9] Schofield O., Kohut J., Aragon D., Et al., Slocum gliders: robust and ready, Journal of Field Robotics, 24, 6, pp. 473-485, (2007)
  • [10] Zhang S., Yu J., Zhang A., Et al., Spiraling motion of underwater gliders: modeling, analysis, and experimental results, Ocean Engineering, 60, 3, pp. 1-13, (2013)