Simulation of progressive failure process in solid rocket propellants using a phase-field model

被引:0
作者
Wang, Tong [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Zhi [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Xiaofei [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Huiqian [3 ]
Zhang, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Yao, Weian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Struct Anal Ind Equipment, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, Int Ctr Computat Mech, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Du Aviat Ind Grp, Nanchang 330024, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Phase field model; Solid propellants; HTPB; UMAT subroutine; Viscoelastic material; BRITTLE-FRACTURE; ABAQUS IMPLEMENTATION; MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR; CRACK-PROPAGATION; COHESIVE FRACTURE; STRAIN-RATE; DAMAGE; CREEP;
D O I
10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110577
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Dense interface cracks and their transformation into matrix cracks of propellants are complicated and pose challenges to existing numerical methods for fracture analysis. However, understanding fracture behavior of solid propellants is a key aspect for the development of high-performance solid rocket motors. We proposed a fracture phase field method in this study accounting for material interfaces to accurately capture the complicated failure processes of solid rocket propellant while a precise computational model is adopted. The widely concerned challenges such as the extremely thin actual interface width, strong material heterogeneity, material viscoelasticity, crack interaction, computational efficiency are all solved or at least eased with the new method. The proposed method has provided a reliable tool for the design and evaluation of propellants which has long been desired in engineering. In addition, we propose an easy implementation way of the proposed method which may be interesting both engineering and academic practices. A few numerical examples with comparison with experimental results are provided for the verification and validation of the proposed method, and the comparison results show excellent agreements.
引用
收藏
页数:38
相关论文
共 102 条
  • [1] Prediction of crack nucleation and propagation in porous ceramics using the phase-field approach
    Abaza, A.
    Laurencin, J.
    Nakajo, A.
    Meille, S.
    Debayle, J.
    Leguillon, D.
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2022, 119
  • [2] Block structured adaptive mesh refinement and strong form elasticity approach to phase field fracture with applications to delamination, crack branching and crack deflection
    Agrawal, Vinamra
    Runnels, Brandon
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 385
  • [3] Phase-field modeling of ductile fracture
    Ambati, M.
    Gerasimov, T.
    De Lorenzis, L.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2015, 55 (05) : 1017 - 1040
  • [4] A review on phase-field models of brittle fracture and a new fast hybrid formulation
    Ambati, Marreddy
    Gerasimov, Tymofiy
    De Lorenzis, Laura
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2015, 55 (02) : 383 - 405
  • [5] 3D multi-scale modelling of mechanical behaviour of sound and leached mortar
    Bernard, F.
    Kamali-Bemard, S.
    Prince, W.
    [J]. CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2008, 38 (04) : 449 - 458
  • [6] A phase-field description of dynamic brittle fracture
    Borden, Michael J.
    Verhoosel, Clemens V.
    Scott, Michael A.
    Hughes, Thomas J. R.
    Landis, Chad M.
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 217 : 77 - 95
  • [7] Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture
    Bourdin, B
    Francfort, GA
    Marigo, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 2000, 48 (04) : 797 - 826
  • [8] The variational approach to fracture
    Bourdin, Blaise
    Francfort, Gilles A.
    Marigo, Jean-Jacques
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELASTICITY, 2008, 91 (1-3) : 5 - 148
  • [9] Grand-potential-based phase-field model of dissolution/precipitation: Lattice Boltzmann simulations of counter term effect on porous medium
    Boutin, Teo
    Verdier, Werner
    Cartalade, Alain
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2022, 207
  • [10] Chang I.S., 2005, P 41 AIAA ASME SAE A, P3793