Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in K-12 education

被引:0
作者
Adams C. [1 ]
Pente P. [1 ]
Lemermeyer G. [2 ]
Rockwell G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Education, University of Alberta
[2] Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta
[3] Department of Philosophy, University of Alberta
来源
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence | 2023年 / 4卷
关键词
AI in K-12 education; AI literacy; AIED; Artificial intelligence in education; Children's rights; Ethics; Pedagogical appropriateness; Teacher well-being;
D O I
10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100131
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Advances in Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) are providing teachers with a wealth of new tools and smart services to facilitate student learning. Meanwhile, growing public concern over the potentially harmful societal effects of AI has prompted the publication of a flurry of AI ethics guidelines and policy documents authored by national and international government agencies, academic consortia and industrial stakeholders. AI ethics policy guidance specific to children and K-12 education has lagged behind; this scene is swiftly changing. In this paper, we examine the ethical principles currently informing AI ethics policy development for children and K-12 education. To accomplish this, we located four recent and globally relevant Artificial Intelligence in K-12 Education (AIEdK-12) ethics guideline statements; we then performed a content analysis of these documents using eleven AI ethics principles identified by Jobin et al. (2019). We found that these AIEdK-12 ethics guidelines employed many of the core principles already employed in non-AIEdK-12 documents—Transparency; Justice and Fairness; Non-maleficence; Responsibility; Privacy; Beneficence; Freedom & Autonomy—and were sometimes adapted for children. We further identified four new ethical principles being employed that are unique to K-12 education, specifically: Pedagogical Appropriateness; Children's Rights; AI Literacy; and Teacher Well-being. Our analysis also calls for a decolonized “humanized posthuman” ethic able to address the intensifying human-AI collaborative environment in classrooms, and able to weigh the complex indications and contraindications for children's and youth's cognitive, social-emotional, physical, cultural and political development. © 2023 The Authors
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Akgun S., Greenhow C., Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, (2021)
[2]  
Algora Lab, Volet 2.4 - the montreal Declaration and public deliberation [video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/4K-sWLh5G3U, (2021)
[3]  
Allies S., Supporting teacher wellbeing: A practical guide for primary teachers and school leaders, (2021)
[4]  
(2021)
[5]  
Benevene P., De Stasio S., Fiorilli C., Editorial: Well-Being of school teachers in their work environment, Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1239, pp. 1-4, (2020)
[6]  
Birhane A., Algorithmic injustice: A relational ethics approach, Patterns, 2, 2, pp. 1-9, (2021)
[7]  
Clark A., We are merging with robots. That's a good thing, (2018)
[8]  
Dernikos B.P., Ferguson D.E., Siegel M., The possibilities for “humanizing” posthumanist inquiries: An intra-active conversation, Critical Studies, Critical Methodologies, 20, 5, pp. 434-447, (2020)
[9]  
Fosch Villaronga E., Kieseberg P., Li T., Humans forget, machines remember: Artificial intelligence and the right to be forgotten, Computer Law & Security Report, 34, 2, pp. 304-313, (2018)
[10]  
Hagendorff T., The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines, Minds and Machines, 30, pp. 99-120, (2020)