Analysis of an opinion dynamics model coupled with an external environmental dynamics

被引:1
作者
Couthures, Anthony [1 ]
Varma, Vineeth Satheeskumar [1 ,2 ]
Lasaulce, Samson [1 ,3 ]
Morarescu, Irinel- Constantin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lorraine, CNRS, CRAN, F-54000 Nancy, France
[2] Tech Univ Cluj Napoca, Automat Dept, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[3] Khalifa Univ, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Complex networks; Opinion dynamics; Bifurcations; Chaotic systems; Limit cycles; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115719
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
We consider a set of individuals, referred to as agents, whose opinions evolve according to nonlinear dynamics. Their opinions impact their behavior or actions, which in turn affect their local environment (for example, via pollution, contamination of a virus, etc.). Each agent can also perceive or observe a signal about the environment, and is influenced by this external signal. This yields a coupled dynamics (opinion and external signal), which behaves in a similar manner to the prey-predator models. One of the main features of our study is that the information provided by the external signal has a significant impact on the opinion dynamics. When the coupling is strong, the external signal may induce either chaotic behavior or convergence towards a limit cycle. When the coupling with the external signal is weak, the classical behavior characterized by local agreements in polarized clusters is observed. In both cases, conditions under which clusters of individuals do not change their actions are provided. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the derived analytical results.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Consensus Problems on Networks With Antagonistic Interactions [J].
Altafini, Claudio .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2013, 58 (04) :935-946
[2]   Nonlinear Opinion Dynamics With Tunable Sensitivity [J].
Bizyaeva, Anastasia ;
Franci, Alessio ;
Leonard, Naomi Ehrich .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2023, 68 (03) :1415-1430
[3]   CONSENSUS AND DISAGREEMENT: THE ROLE OF QUANTIZED BEHAVIORS IN OPINION DYNAMICS [J].
Ceragioli, Francesca ;
Frasca, Paolo .
SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 2018, 56 (02) :1058-1080
[4]  
Chowdhury NR, 2016, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P1739, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2016.7798516
[5]   Analysis of a continuous opinion and discrete action model coupled with an external dynamics* [J].
Couthures, A. ;
Mongaillard, T. ;
Varma, V. S. ;
Lasaulce, S. ;
Morarescu, I. C. .
2024 EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, ECC 2024, 2024, :3392-3397
[6]   Mixing beliefs among interacting agents [J].
Deffuant, G ;
Neau, D ;
Amblard, F ;
Weisbuch, G .
APPLICATIONS OF SIMULATION TO SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2000, :87-98
[7]   REACHING A CONSENSUS [J].
DEGROOT, MH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1974, 69 (345) :118-121
[8]   SOCIAL-INFLUENCE AND OPINIONS [J].
FRIEDKIN, NE ;
JOHNSEN, EC .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, 1990, 15 (3-4) :193-205
[9]   Modeling the Co-evolution of Climate Impact and Population Behavior: A Mean-Field Analysis [J].
Frieswijk, K. ;
Zino, L. ;
Cao, M. ;
Morse, A. S. .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2023, 56 (02) :7381-7386
[10]   Comprehensive study on impact assessment of lockdown on overall ambient air quality amid COVID-19 in Delhi and its NCR, India [J].
Garg, Anchal ;
Kumar, Arvind ;
Gupta, N. C. .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS LETTERS, 2021, 2