Spatial distribution characteristics of heavy metal pollution and health risk in soil around the coal industrial area of East Junggar Basin

被引：0
作者：
Liu F. [1 ,2 ]
Tiyip T. [1 ]
Ilyas N. [1 ]
Wang N. [3 ]
Yang C. [1 ]
Xia N. [1 ]
Gao Y.-X. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology, College of Resources and Environment Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi
[2] Department of Landscaping and Gardens, Xinjiang Applicational Vocational and Technical College, Kuitun
[3] Changji Management Station, Mt. Kalamaili Ungulate Nation Reserve, Changji
来源：
Tiyip, Tashpolat (tash@xju.edu.cn) | 1600年 / Science Press卷 / 37期
关键词：
Geostatistial analysis; Health risk; Heavy metals; Pollution load; Soils;
D O I：
10.13227/j.hjkx.201604222
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The soil around the coal industrial area of East Junggar Basin in Xinjiang was studied. A total of 64 soil samples were collected from the 0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, 20-30 cm layers of soil profile, and the contents of Zn, Cu, Cr, Pb, Hg and As were tested, respectively. Pollution Load Index (PLI) was employed to assess the heavy metal contents and the model of health risk assessment recommended by USEPA was adopted to evaluate the health risk due to exposure to heavy metals in different soil depths. The multivariate statistical analysis, geostatistical analysis and GIS technology then were used to study the differences, spatial variability structure and distribution pattern of the evaluated results, and cross-validation method was adopted to assess the prediction results and its stability. The results suggested that the ranges of Zn, Cu, Pb contents were 46.06-48.00 mg·kg-1, 18.37-19.271 mg·kg-1 and 11.30-13.29 mg·kg-1, which did not exceed the standard compared with the background values of soil in Xinjiang. The ranges of Cr, Hg, As contents were 80.29-85.42 mg·kg-1, 0.06-0.07 mg·kg-1, 30.64-31.52 mg·kg-1, all of which exceeded the standard compared with the background values of soil in Xinjiang, and the exceeded rate was 60%. The values of PLI were in the order of PLI0-10 cm(1.35)>PLI20-30 cm(1.28)>PLI10-20 cm(1.25), which belonged to slightly polluted level. The values of HI were in the order of HI0-10 cm(2.53E-01)>HI20-30 cm(2.48E-01)>HI10-20 cm (2.43E-01), which indicated there was no non-carcinogenic risk. The values of TCR were in the order of TCR0-10 cm(2.81E-05)>TCR20-30 cm(2.80E-05)>TCR10-20 cm (2.74E-05), which was the acceptable level of carcinogenic risk. According to One-way ANOVA analyses, there was no noticeable difference in the PLI, HI, TCR (α is 0.863, 0.134, 0.056 respectively). Geo-statistical Analysis results implied that the regions with high contents of Zn, Cu and As were distributed near the coal industrial area and Northern part of study area in the 0-10 cm soil layer, Pb formed V-shaped high content ribbon, high content of Hg was located in the middle and Southern area, and high content of Cr was located in Coal Industrial Area and the anterior radial decline. High values of PLI, HI and TCR were found in north of the study area. The moderate pollution region of PLI decreased with the increase of soil depth, whereas HI and TCR showed no significant change. On the whole, high degree of heavy metals pollution and high possibility of health risk were mainly distributed around the six coal industrial areas which are in the high density population zone. Especially, the pollution of Cr, Hg, As was relatively serious and the health risk of As was the most serious which should be attached great importance to. © 2016, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：4815 / 4829
页数：14
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Wang G.C., Li P.F., Wang H., Et al., Assessments of integrated ecosystems in mining areas based on emergy analysis, Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35, 13, pp. 4367-4376, (2015)
  • [2] Zhou Z.D., Wang C.X., Fu X., Et al., Evaluation index system on ecological effect of national large-scale coal-fired power base based on the DPSIR conceptual model, Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 11, pp. 2830-2836, (2014)
  • [3] Zhang L., Zhou J., Liu J., Discussion on the ecological environment problem of the coal electricity and coal chemical industry region in East Junggar Basion, Environmental Protection of Xinjiang, 35, 3, pp. 47-50, (2013)
  • [4] Li C.C., Zhang G.S., Yao F., Et al., Assessment of soil heavy metal pollution in area of Xinjiang Zhundong Wucaiwan surface coal mine, Environmental Engineering, 32, 6, pp. 142-146, (2014)
  • [5] Yao F., Bao A.M., Gulij P.E., Et al., Soil heavy metal sources and pollution assessment in the coalfield of East Junggar Basin in XinJiang, China Environmental Science, 33, 11, pp. 1821-1828, (2013)
  • [6] Liu F., Tashpolatt, Ilyasn, Et al., Pollution and potential ecological risk of soil heavy metals around the coalfield of East Junggar Basin, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 24, 8, pp. 1388-1393, (2015)
  • [7] Zou J.M., Sun J., Dai W., Et al., Evaluation and analysis of heavy metals in cultivated soils in the suburbs of Beijing, Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 35, 1, pp. 132-138, (2013)
  • [8] Mo X.R., Wu L.S., Deng S.T., Et al., Health risk assessment of heavy metal in soil of demolished smelting site, Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 10, 4, pp. 235-243, (2015)
  • [9] Liu D.X., Ma J.H., Sun Y.L., Et al., Spatial distribution of soil magnetic susceptibility and correlation with heavy metal pollution in Kaifeng City, China, CATENA, 139, pp. 53-60, (2016)
  • [10] Duan H.J., Cai X.Q., Ruan X.L., Et al., Assessment of heavy metal pollution and its health risk of surface dusts from parks of Kaifeng, China, Environmental Science, 36, 8, pp. 2972-2980, (2015)
123456