Trajectory Planning for Connected and Automated Vehicles: Cruising, Lane Changing, and Platooning

被引:3
作者
Liu X. [1 ]
Zhao G. [2 ]
Masoud N. [3 ]
Zhu Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern University, United States
[2] University of Maryland, United States
[3] University of Michigan, United States
来源
SAE International Journal of Connected and Automated Vehicles | 2021年 / 4卷 / 04期
关键词
Connected and automated vehicles; Lane changing; Platooning; Trajectory planning;
D O I
10.4271/12-04-04-0025
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Autonomy and connectivity are considered among the most promising technologies to improve safety and mobility and reduce fuel consumption and travel delay in transportation systems. In this paper, we devise an optimal control-based trajectory planning model that can provide safe and efficient trajectories for the subject vehicle while incorporating platoon formation and lane-changing decisions. We embed this trajectory planning model in a simulation framework to quantify its fuel efficiency and travel time reduction benefits for the subject vehicle in a dynamic traffic environment. Specifically, we compare and analyze the statistical performance of different controller designs in which lane changing or platooning may be enabled, under different values of time (VoTs) for travelers. Results from extensive numerical experiments indicate that our design can not only provide first-hand cost savings for the subject vehicle but also second-hand savings for vehicles upstream of the subject vehicle. Experiments also highlight that lane changing and platooning can both offer benefits, depending on the relative values of fuel cost and the traveler's VoT: with a small VoT, the fuel efficiency benefits of platooning outweigh time savings offered by lane changing. However, a vehicle with a high VoT may find it more beneficial to travel outside of a platoon and complete its trip faster by leveraging lane changes. ©
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Monteil J., Billot R., Sau J., Armetta F., Et al., Cooperative Highway Traffic: Multiagent Modeling and Robustness Assessment of Local Perturbations, Transportation Research Record, 2391, 1, pp. 1-10, (2013)
  • [2] Ersal T., Kolmanovsky I., Masoud N., Ozay N., Et al., Connected and Automated Road Vehicles: State of the Art and Future Challenges, Vehicle System Dynamics, 58, 5, pp. 672-704, (2020)
  • [3] Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems, Sae Standard J, 3016, pp. 1-16, (2014)
  • [4] Zhang Z., Tafreshian A., Masoud N., Modular Transit: Using Autonomy and Modularity to Improve Performance in Public Transportation, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 141, (2020)
  • [5] Masoud N., Jayakrishnan R., Formulations for Optimal Shared Ownership and Use of Autonomous or Driverless Vehicles, pp. 1-17, (2016)
  • [6] Van Wyk F., Khojandi A., Masoud N., Optimal Switching Policy between Driving Entities in Semi-Autonomous Vehicles, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 114, pp. 517-531, (2020)
  • [7] Masoud N., Jayakrishnan R., Autonomous or Driver-Less Vehicles: Implementation Strategies and Operational Concerns, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 108, pp. 179-194, (2017)
  • [8] Van Wyk F., Khojandi A., Masoud N., A Path towards Understanding Factors Affecting Crash Severity in Autonomous Vehicles Using Current Naturalistic Driving Data, pp. 106-120, (2019)
  • [9] Gasparetto A., Boscariol P., Lanzutti A., Vidoni R., Path Planning and Trajectory Planning Algorithms: A General Overview, Motion and Operation Planning of Robotic Systems, 29, pp. 3-27, (2015)
  • [10] Zhang S., Deng W., Zhao Q., Sun H., Litkouhi B., Dynamic Trajectory Planning for Vehicle Autonomous Driving, pp. 4161-4166, (2013)