Shifting forms of Engagement: Volunteer Learning in Online Citizen Science

被引:7
|
作者
Jackson C.B. [1 ]
Østerlund C. [2 ]
Crowston K. [2 ]
Harandi M. [2 ]
Trouille L. [3 ]
机构
[1] University of California, Berkeley and Syracuse University, Berkeley
[2] Syracuse University, Syracuse
[3] Adler Planetarium, Chicago
来源
| 1600年 / Association for Computing Machinery, 2 Penn Plaza, Suite 701, New York, NY 10121-0701, United States卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
citizen science; learning; user behavior;
D O I
10.1145/3392841
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Peer production projects involve people in many tasks, from editing articles to analyzing datasets. To facilitate mastery of these practices, projects offer a number of learning resources, ranging from project-defined FAQsto individually-oriented search tools and communal discussion boards. However, it is not clear which project resources best support participant learning, overall and at different stages of engagement. We draw onSørensen's framework of forms of presence to distinguish three types of engagement with learning resources:authoritative, agent-centered and communal. We assigned resources from the Gravity Spy citizen-science into these three categories and analyzed trace data recording interactions with resources using a mixed-effects logistic regression with volunteer performance as an outcome variable. The findings suggest that engagement with authoritative resources (e.g., those constructed by project organizers) facilitates performance initially. However, as tasks become more difficult, volunteers seek and benefit from engagement with their own agent-centered resources and community-generated resources. These findings suggest a broader scope for the design of learning resources for peer production. © 2020 ACM.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Journey of Citizen Science Data in an Online Environment
    He, Yurong
    Weber, Michele
    Preece, Jennifer
    McKeon, Seabird
    Hammock, Jennifer
    Wiggins, Andrea
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH ACM CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND SOCIAL COMPUTING COMPANION, 2016, : 289 - 292
  • [22] Branding the MEGA lab; methods to improve science communication and citizen science engagement
    Kapono, Clifford A.
    Kane, Haunani H.
    Burns, John H. R.
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [23] Machine learning, misinformation, and citizen science
    Yee, Adrian K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2023, 13 (04)
  • [24] Machine learning, misinformation, and citizen science
    Adrian K. Yee
    European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2023, 13
  • [25] Citizen science communication and engagement: a growing concern for researchers and practitioners
    Hecker, Susanne
    JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2022, 21 (07):
  • [26] Engagement and Communication Features of Scientifically Successful Citizen Science Projects
    Golumbic, Yaela N.
    Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet
    Koichu, Boris
    ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 2020, 14 (04): : 465 - 480
  • [27] Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science
    Spiers, Helen
    Swanson, Alexandra
    Fortson, Lucy
    Simmons, Brooke D.
    Trouille, Laura
    Blickhan, Samantha
    Lintott, Chris
    JCOM-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2019, 18 (01):
  • [28] Incorporating citizen science engagement in a vector surveillance undergraduate internship
    Helen Urpi Wagner-Coello
    Maria Elena Villar
    Matthew DeGennaro
    Discover Education, 3 (1):
  • [29] Showcasing citizen science to promote changes and engagement in your community
    Escobar, Diana
    Ribas, Rebeca
    Lorenzo-Gotor, Nieves
    Cordero, Beatriz
    CHANGE - THE TRANSFORMATIVE POWER OF CITIZEN SCIENCE, 2024, 6 : 171 - 177
  • [30] Characteristics of immersive citizen science experiences that drive conservation engagement
    Day, Georgia
    Fuller, Richard A.
    Nichols, Cassandra
    Dean, Angela J.
    PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2022, 4 (04) : 983 - 995