Human locomotion classification for different terrains using machine learning techniques

被引:4
作者
Negi S. [1 ,2 ]
Negi P.C.B.S. [1 ]
Sharma S. [1 ]
Sharma N. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh
[2] Department of Electrical Engineering, G.B. Pant Institute of Engineering & Technology, Pauri, Uttarakhand
关键词
Electromyography; Gait analysis; Locomotion mode classification; Machine learning;
D O I
10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2020035013
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Gait analysis on healthy subjects was performed based on surface electromyographic and acceleration sensor signal, implemented through machine learning approaches. The surface EMG and 3-axes acceleration signals have been acquired for 5 different terrains: level ground, ramp ascent, ramp descent, stair ascent, and stair descent. These signals were acquired from the tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius medial head muscles that correspond to dorsiflexion and plantar flexion, respectively. After feature extraction, these signals are fed to 5 conventional classifiers: linear discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbors, decision tree, random forest, and support vector machine, that classify different terrains for human locomotion. We compared the classification results for the above classifiers with deep neural network classifier. The objective was to obtain the features and classifiers that are able to discriminate between 5 locomotion terrains with maximum classification accuracy in minimum time by acquiring the signal from the least number of leg mus-cles. The results indicated that the support vector machine gives the highest classification accuracy of 99.20 (± 0.80)% for the dataset acquired from 15 healthy subjects. In terms of both accuracy and computation time, the support vector machine outperforms other classifiers. © 2020 by Begell House, Inc. www.begellhouse.com.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 209
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Winter DA, Biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly and pathological, (1991)
  • [2] Tao W, Liu T, Zheng R, Feng H., Gait analysis using wearable sensors, Sensors, 12, 2, pp. 2255-2283, (2012)
  • [3] Prakash C, Kumar R, Mittal N., Recent developments in human gait research: Parameters, approaches, applica-tions, machine learning techniques, datasets and chal-lenges, Artific Intell Rev, 49, 1, pp. 1-40, (2018)
  • [4] Yang JF, Winter DA., Surface EMG profiles during different walking cadences in humans, Electroencephalog Clin Neurophysiol, 60, 6, pp. 485-491, (1985)
  • [5] Patla AE., Some characteristics of EMG patterns during lo-comotion: Implications for the locomotor control process, J Motor Behav, 17, 4, pp. 443-461, (1985)
  • [6] Huang H, Kuiken TA, Lipschutz RD., A strategy for identi-fying locomotion modes using surface electromyography, IEEE Transact Biomed Engin, 56, 1, pp. 65-73, (2008)
  • [7] Huang H, Zhang F, Hargrove LJ, Dou Z, Rogers DR, En-glehart KB., Continuous locomotion-mode identification for prosthetic legs based on neuromuscular–mechanical fu-sion, IEEE Transact Biomed Engin, 58, 10, pp. 2867-2875, (2011)
  • [8] Zhang F, Huang H., Source selection for real-time user in-tent recognition toward volitional control of artificial legs, IEEE J Biomed Health Inform, 17, 5, pp. 907-914, (2012)
  • [9] Liu M, Zhang F, Huang HH., An adaptive classification strategy for reliable locomotion mode recognition, Sen-sors, 17, 9, (2017)
  • [10] Chen B, Zheng E, Fan X, Liang T, Wang Q, Wei K, Wang L., Locomotion mode classification using a wearable ca-pacitive sensing system, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng, 21, 5, pp. 744-755, (2013)