TMD's control effect on stability of three kinds of floating wind turbine

被引：0

作者：

Huang Z. ^{[1
]}

Ding Q. ^{[1
]}

Li C. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai

来源：

Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock | 2019年 / 38卷 / 21期

关键词：

Dynamic response; Floating wind turbine; Structure control; Tuned mass damper (TMD);

D O I：

10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2019.21.016

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Steady operation of floating wind turbines is a basic requirement for construction of offshore wind farms. Here, in order to compare control effects of tuned mass dampers (TMDs) on stability of different floating wind turbines, three kinds of floating wind turbine were chosen including barge type, spar one and semi-submersible one. TMDs were configured in turbines' cabin for control. TMD's control effects on stability of three kinds of floating wind turbine under combination action of wind, wave and flow loads were studied. The results showed that without TMD control, barge-type floating wind turbine has a much larger response amplitude than those of spar-type and semi-type ones; with TMD control, barge-type floating wind turbine's response is greatly reduced, in platform head yaw direction and tower top left-to-right one, barge-type floating wind turbine's responses are close to those of spar-type and semi-type ones, respectively; TMD has different control effects on different types of floating wind turbine, TMD has the best control effect on barge-type floating wind turbine, followed by spar type and semi-type ones; the study results can provide a theoretical reference for design and development of floating wind turbines. © 2019, Editorial Office of Journal of Vibration and Shock. All right reserved.

引用

页码：112 / 119and147

共 16 条

[1]

Ding Q., Li C., Ye K., Et al., Effect of wind, wave and current on movement characteristics of array of floating wind turbine Spar platform, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 32, 21, pp. 223-229, (2016)

[2]

Huang Z., Li C., Ding Q., Et al., Dynamic response and mooring performance of a semi-submersible platform for floating wind turbine considering typhoon sea states, Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 37, 12, pp. 1015-1022, (2017)

[3]

Ding Q., Li C., Zhou G., Et al., Comparison of dynamic response between stationary and floating wind turbine, Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 36, 1, pp. 65-73, (2016)

[4]

Ding Q., Li C., Ye Z., Et al., Research on optimization for dynamic response of the platform of floating wind turbine, Acta Energiae Solaris Sinca, 38, 5, pp. 1405-1414, (2017)

[5]

Zhang L., Deng H., Numerical analysis on stability of the semi-submersible platform of floating wind turbines, Applied Science and Technology, 38, 10, pp. 13-17, (2011)

[6]

Musial W., Butterfield S., Boone A., Feasibility of Floating Platform Systems for Wind turbines, (2003)

[7]

Jonkman J., Dynamics modeling and loads analysis of an offshore floating wind turbine, (2008)

[8]

Jia W., Xie S., Jin X., The analysis of tower fore-art vibration control effects for onshore and offshore wind turbines based on the feedback control strategy, Journal of Xihua University, 34, 6, pp. 32-36, (2015)

[9]

Namik H., Stol K., Individual blade pitch control of floating offshore wind turbines, Wind Energy, 13, 1, pp. 74-85, (2010)

[10]

Lackner M.A., Controlling platform motions and reducing blade loads for floating wind turbines, Wind Engineering, 33, 6, pp. 541-554, (2010)

← 1 2 →