Prediction method of driving risk in complex environment based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model

被引:0
作者
Chen X.L. [1 ]
Jim G.J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang Industry Polytechnic College, Shaoxing
[2] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul
来源
Advances in Transportation Studies | 2020年 / 1卷 / Special Issue期
关键词
Complex environment; Driving; Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; Model; Risk prediction; Vehicle;
D O I
10.4399/97888255318621
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to solve the problems of low prediction accuracy and poor real-time prediction in traditional driving risk prediction methods of vehicle, a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based driving risk prediction method in complex environment is proposed. In this method, the driving sample data are filtered first, and the incomplete and unstable driving data are removed. The vehicle’s driving model is constructed with the processed data, and the force and dynamics of the vehicle’s driving model are analyzed with the particle dynamics. The risk factor analysis set is constructed, the entropy weight method is used to determine the risk factor weight, and the five level classification method is used to construct the risk assessment set according to the analysis results of the weight method. The fuzzy evaluation matrix of vehicle’s driving risk in complex environment is designed, and the risk prediction model is constructed to realize the prediction of vehicle’s driving risk in complex environment. The experimental results show that the prediction accuracy of the proposed method is as high as 0.98, and the prediction is real-time and reliable. © 2020, Gioacchino Onorati Editore. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 12
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Ali A.N., Sang H.L., Javaan C., Vehicle’s driving risk prediction method based on decision tree algorithm, Let Image Processing, 11, 5, pp. 292-300, (2017)
  • [2] Altche F., Qian X., An Algorithm for Supervised Driving of Cooperative Semi-Autonomous Vehicles Extended, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 99, pp. 1-13, (2017)
  • [3] Ba Y.T., Zhang W., Peng Q.J., Risk-taking on the road and in the mind: Behavioural and neural patterns of decision making between risky and safe drivers, Ergonomics, 59, 1, pp. 27-38, (2016)
  • [4] Guo Y., Yu S.Z., Li H., Vehicle’s driving risk prediction method based on rough set and support vector machine, Journal Ofpower Supply, 17, 3, pp. 172-181, (2019)
  • [5] Hu X.C., Witold P., Wang X.M., Granular Fuzzy Rule-based Models: A Study in a Comprehensive Evaluation ofFuzzy Models, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 99, pp. 1-11, (2017)
  • [6] Ji G.J., Wang Y.L., Study on control strategy of energy-saving elevator with super capacitor based on fuzzy control, Chinese Journal Ofpower Sources, 40, 8, (2016)
  • [7] Noah J., From Trolleys to Risk: Models for Ethical Autonomous Driving, American Journal of Public Health, 107, 4, (2017)
  • [8] Peter W., Anna W., Hans P.H., SUV driving “masculinizes” risk behavior in females: A public health challenge, Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 129, 17, pp. 625-629, (2017)
  • [9] Qin Z.C., Wan T., Zhao H.Q., Hybrid clustering of data and vague concepts based on labels semantics, Annals of Operations Research, 256, 3, pp. 1-24, (2017)
  • [10] Richard S.J., Robert J., Comment on ‘The Global Impacts of Extreme Sea-Level Rise: A Comprehensive Economic Assessment’, Environmental & Resource Economics, 64, 2, pp. 225-253, (2016)