Path Analysis of Efficiency Improvement of Agricultural Economic Management by Rural Revitalization Strategy in Information Age

被引:0
作者
Liu N. [1 ]
机构
[1] WENZHOU BUSINESS COLLEGE, Zhejiang, Wenzhou
来源
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences | 2024年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
Agricultural economic management; Data envelopment analysis; Entropy weight TOPSIS method; Gray correlation;
D O I
10.2478/amns-2024-0025
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accompanied by the accelerating rural economic development, agricultural economic management faces the challenge of efficiency improvement difficulties. This paper mainly analyzes the main factors that affect the efficiency of agricultural economic management in the rural revitalization strategy using the entropy weight method and grey correlation degree method. The entropy weight TOPSIS method is used to measure the development level of agricultural rural revitalization and determine the main evaluation dimensions of rural revitalization strategies. For the efficiency of agricultural economic management, the level was measured using the data envelopment analysis method and combined with the grey correlation degree to assess the technical progress and benefit changes brought about by the rural revitalization strategy on agricultural economic management. The results show that the correlation between rural revitalization and agricultural economic management efficiency is 0.9036, and the correlation between production revitalization and talent revitalization and agricultural economic management is 0.8382 and 0.7206, respectively, which indicates that production revitalization and talent revitalization have a strong correlation on agricultural economic management efficiency, and agricultural science and technology should be introduced to improve the productivity of the agricultural industry, so as to promote the improvement of the efficiency of agricultural economic management. © 2023 Ning Liu,
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Georgios C., Nikolaos N., Michalis P., Neo‐endogenous rural development: a path toward reviving rural europe*, Rural Sociology, (2021)
  • [2] Cagliero R., Licciardo F., Legnini M., The evaluation framework in the new cap 2023-2027: a reflection in the light of lessons learned from rural development, Sustainability, 13, 10, pp. 1-19, (2021)
  • [3] Nizam D., Tatari M.F., Rural revitalization through territorial distinctiveness: the use of geographical indications in turkey, Journal of Rural Studies, 93, (2022)
  • [4] Lu N.G.X., Examining the influencing factors of forest health, its implications on rural revitalization: a case study of five forest farms in beijing, Land Use Policy, 102, 1, (2021)
  • [5] Shi G., Chavas, Jean-Paul, An economic analysis of risk, management, and agricultural technology, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, (2015)
  • [6] Jayanti V., Agricultural market information through technology, Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing, (2022)
  • [7] Wang Z.G., Wang H.Q., Feng M.C., Qin M.X., Zhang X.R., Xie Y.K., Et al., Study on the monitoring and classification of winter wheat freezing injury in spring based on 3s technology, The Journal of Agricultural Science, 9-10, (2021)
  • [8] Pan D., The impact of agricultural extension on farmer nutrient management behavior in chinese rice production: a household-level analysis, Sustainability, 6, 10, pp. 6644-6665, (2014)
  • [9] Chen X., Xin X., The core of china’s rural revitalization: exerting the functions of rural area, China Agricultural Economic Review, 12, 1, pp. 1-13, (2019)
  • [10] Liu L.W.M., Research on novel pattern of agricultural economy based on accurate information management system: a survey, International Journal of Technology, Management, (2015)