A social performance metrics framework for sustainable manufacturing

被引:0
作者
Henao R. [1 ]
Sarache W. [2 ]
Gomez I. [2 ]
机构
[1] Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Manizales, Campus la Nubia, Manizales
[2] Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Manizales
关键词
Manufacturing; Manufacturing social metrics; Performance; Social metrics; Sustainability;
D O I
10.1504/IJISE.2021.115316
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Manufacturing companies are under constant pressure from stakeholders to achieve higher sustainability levels, especially in terms of environmental and social aspects. Although social performance is not a new topic in operations management, it is the least explored pillar of the triple bottom-line approach. Metrics for the assessment of social performance levels remain scarce, which limits those companies that are willing to involve them in decision-making processes. This situation can be attributed to the difficulty of finding sufficiently comparable, widespread, and quantifiable social metrics. Therefore, the present study aims to provide a broader perspective of social performance, including both internal and external metrics. With the goal of providing a more holistic performance assessment, and based on findings present in the current literature, a social performance metrics framework is proposed. The framework proposes a three-layer approach, which allows companies to strengthen their social performance evaluation, based on internal metrics, while dealing with more complex external metrics. Copyright © 2021 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 197
页数:30
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
Abdul-Rashid S.H., Sakundarini N., Ghazilla R.A.R., Thurasamy R., The impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on sustainability performance, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 37, 2, pp. 182-204, (2017)
[2]  
Barnett M.L., Salomon R.M., Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance, Strategic Management Journal, 33, 11, pp. 1304-1320, (2012)
[3]  
Bernhardt T., Pollak R., Economic and social upgrading dynamics in global manufacturing value chains: a comparative analysis, Environment and Planning A, 48, 7, pp. 1220-1243, (2016)
[4]  
Beschorner T., Muller M., Social Standards: toward an active ethical involvement of businesses in developing countries, Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 1, pp. 11-20, (2007)
[5]  
Besiou M., Van Wassenhove L.N., Addressing the challenge of modeling for decision-making in socially responsible operations, Production and Operations Management, 24, 9, pp. 1390-1401, (2015)
[6]  
Beske-Janssen P., Johnson M.P., Schaltegger S., 20 years of performance measurement in sustainable supply chain management – what has been achieved?, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20, 6, pp. 664-680, (2015)
[7]  
Bhatti M.I., Awan H.M., Razaq Z., The key performance indicators (KPIs) and their impact on overall organizational performance, Quality and Quantity, 48, 6, pp. 3127-3143, (2014)
[8]  
Bortolotti T., Danese P., Flynn B.B., Romano P., Leveraging fitness and lean bundles to build the cumulative performance sand cone model, International Journal of Production Economics, 162, pp. 227-241, (2015)
[9]  
Boukherroub T., Ruiz A., Guinet A., Fondrevelle J., An integrated approach for the optimization of the sustainable performance: a wood supply chain, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, pp. 186-191, (2013)
[10]  
Bowen H.R., Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, (1953)