Estimation of Maize FPAR Based on UAV Multispectral Remote Sensing

被引：0
|
作者：
Wang L. [1 ,2 ]
He J. [1 ,2 ]
Zheng G. [1 ,3 ]
Guo Y. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang Y. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang H. [1 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Institution of Agricultural Economy and Information, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou
[2] Key Laboratory of Smart Agriculture in Huang - Huai - Hai Plain, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhengzhou
[3] Henan Province Engineering Research Center for Crop Planting Monitoring and Early Warning, Zhengzhou
来源：
Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery | 2022年 / 53卷 / 10期
关键词：
fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation; maize; multispectral remote sensing; texture index; unmanned aerial vehicle; vegetation index;
D O I：
10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2022.10.021
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In order to explore the potential of estimating the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) of crops from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) multispectral remote sensing images, the vegetation index, texture index and leaf area index (LAI) were extracted from UAV multispectral images, which were used as model input parameters. On the basis of analyzing the correlation between different parameters and FPAR, the vegetation index and texture index were optimized. The FPAR of maize was estimated by unary linear regression (UL), multivariate stepwise regression model (MSR), ridge regression model (RR) and BP neural network model (BPNN). The results showed that the vegetation indexes, texture indices and LAI had a strong correlation relationship with FPAR, and the absolute value of correlation coefficient of vegetation index was the largest. Among different types of FPAR estimation models, BPNN model had the best estimation effect. The determination coefficient (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) of FPAR estimation model were 0.857 and 0.173, respectively. The R2 and RMSE of validation model were 0.868 and 0.186, respectively. The relative error (RE) between model estimation value and field measured value was 8.71%. In different combinations of model parameters, the FPAR model fused with vegetation index, texture index and LAI had the best estimation and verification effect, which indicated that the fusion of multi feature parameters can effectively improve the estimation effect of FPAR. These results provided a scientific basis for precision estimation of maize FPAR and production potential based on UAV multispectral remote sensing data. © 2022 Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：202 / 210
页数：8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] ZHANG Chao, CAI Huanjie, LI Zhijun, Estimation of fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation for winter wheat based on hyperspectral characteristic parameters [ J ], Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 35, 9, pp. 2644-2649, (2015)
  • [2] LIU R Y, REN HZ, LIU S H, Et al., Evaluation of MODIS, POLDER and CYCLOPES global FPAR products [ C], IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, pp. 5068-5071, (2014)
  • [3] MADANI N, KIMBALL J S, AFFLECK D L R, Et al., Improving ecosystem productivity modeling through spatially explicit estimation of optimal light use efficiency [ J], Journal of Geophysical Research
  • [4] Biogeosciences, 119, 9, pp. 1755-1769, (2014)
  • [5] WEISS M, BARET F, GARRIGUES S, Et al., LAI and fAPAR CYCLOPES global products derived from VEGETATION. Part 2: validation and comparison with MODIS collection 4 products, Remote Sensing of Environment, 110, 3, pp. 317-331, (2007)
  • [6] ZHAO P, FAN W J, LIU Y, Et al., Study of the remote sensing model of FAPAR over rugged terrains, Remote Sensing, 8, 4, (2016)
  • [7] TIAN Dingfang, FAN Wenjie, REN Huazhong, Progress of fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation retrieval from remote sensing data, Journal of Remote Sensing, 24, 11, pp. 1307-1324, (2020)
  • [8] LIU Erhua, ZHOU Guangsheng, ZHOU Li, Fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation over summer maize canopy estimated by hyperspectral remote sensing under different drought conditions [ J ], Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 30, 6, pp. 2021-2029, (2019)
  • [9] HE Jia, LIU Bingfeng, LI Jun, FPAR monitoring model of winter wheat based on hyperspectral reflectance at different growth stages [ J ], Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 46, 2, pp. 261-269, (2015)
  • [10] LIU Guipeng, HE Ting, WANG Guojiao, Et al., Hyperspectral estimation of maize LAI and FPAR [ J ], Journal of Maize Sciences, 24, 2, pp. 115-119, (2016)
1234