Direct numerical simulation of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction in hollow cylinder-flare configuration at Mach number 6

被引:0
作者
Sun D. [1 ]
Liu P. [1 ]
Shen P. [1 ]
Tong F. [1 ]
Guo Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics, Mianyang
来源
Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica | 2021年 / 42卷 / 12期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Direct numerical simulation; Görtler vortices; Hypersonic; Proper orthogonal decomposition; Shock wave/boundary layer interaction;
D O I
10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24681
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The compressibility effect in the hypersonic shock wave/boundary layer interaction is much stronger than that in the supersonic interaction, and after the reattachment, the high local pressure and thermal load will form, thereby significantly influencing the flight safety of vehicles. The three-dimensionality of the shock wave/boundary layer interaction further complicates the flow structures, making them more difficult to predict. In this study, a direct numerical simulation on the hypersonic shock wave/boundary layer interaction is performed. The effects of Görtler vortices on the separation bubble, the wall pressure and the heat flux are investigated both qualitatively and quantitatively. The investigation results indicate that the separation bubble exhibits obvious three-dimensionality and the size of the bubble at the spanwise separation location is significantly smaller than that at the spanwise reattachment location. The bubbles at the two locations change synchronously. The pressure and the heat flux exhibit inhomogeneous distribution in the spanwise direction. The mean pressure and the heat flux at the spanwise reattachment location are 13% and 16.2% higher than those at the spanwise separation locations, respectively. The ratios for the fluctuations of pressure and heat flux are 28% and 20% higher, respectively. The proper orthogonal decomposition analyses indicate that the energy concentrates on the shear layer above the bubble and the low-order modes at the spanwise reattachment occupy more energy than those at the separation location. © 2021, Beihang University Aerospace Knowledge Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
DOLLING D S., Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research-What next?, AIAA Journal, 39, pp. 1517-1531, (2001)
[2]  
ANDREOPOULOS J, MUCK K., Some new aspects of the shock wave boundary layer interaction in compression ramp flows, 24th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, (1986)
[3]  
ERENGIL M E, DOLLING D S., Physical causes of separation shock unsteadiness in shock-wave/boundary layer interactions: AIAA-1993-3134, (1993)
[4]  
BERESH S J, CLEMENS N T, DOLLING D S., Relationship between upstream turbulent boundary-layer velocity fluctuations and separation shock unsteadiness, AIAA Journal, 40, 12, pp. 2412-2422, (2002)
[5]  
CLEMENS N T, NARAYANASWAMY V., Low-frequency unsteadiness of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 46, 1, pp. 469-492, (2014)
[6]  
PIROZZOLI S, GRASSO F., Direct numerical simulation of impinging shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction at M=2.25, Physics of Fluids, 18, 6, (2006)
[7]  
PRIEBE S, MARTIN M P., Low-frequency unsteadiness in shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interaction, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 699, pp. 1-49, (2012)
[8]  
TOUBER E, SANDHAM N D., Large-eddy simulation of low-frequency unsteadiness in a turbulent shock-induced separation bubble, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 23, 2, pp. 79-107, (2009)
[9]  
GRILLI M, SCHMID P J, HICKEL S, Et al., Analysis of unsteady behaviour in shockwave turbulent boundary layer interaction, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 700, pp. 16-28, (2012)
[10]  
BOOKEY P, WYCKHAM C, SMITS A., Experimental investigations of Mach 3 shock-wave turbulent boundary layer interactions, 35th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, (2005)