Study on Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Action of a Postbiotic Prepared by Co-fermenting Three Lactic Acid Bacteria against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

被引：0

作者：

Lan D. ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Qu X. ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Yu H. ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Huang T. ^{[3
]}

Peng C. ^{[1
,2
]}

Yao G. ^{[3
]}

Zhao J. ^{[1
,2
]}

Li Z. ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] College of Food Science and Engineering, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao

[2] Qingdao Special Food Research Institute, Qingdao

[3] Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot

来源：

Science and Technology of Food Industry | 2023年 / 44卷 / 21期

关键词：

antibacterial; antibacterial mechanism; antibiotic resistance; biofilm; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; postbiotics;

D O I：

10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023020029

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

To prepare a postbiotic with good antibacterial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and to study its antibacterial effect and action mode, a postbiotic named YDFF was prepared by co-fermenting Lactococcus lactis subsp Postbio-F3, Lactobacillus paracasei Postbio-P6 and Lactobacillus fermentans Postbio-Q7, its antibacterial activity against MRSA was determined by both inhibition zone and growth curve, and the active ingredients exerting antibacterial activity were preliminarily identified. The antibacterial mechanism of YDFF on MRSA was investigated by detecting the effects of YDFF on MRSA biofilm formation, ultrastructural changes, DNA leakage, and ROS generation. Furthermore, the effect of YDFF on the antibiotic resistance of MRSA to methicillin was explored by chessboard method. The results showed that the postbiotic YDFF had good antibacterial activity against MRSA (The diameter of inhibition zone was 19.1±1.5 mm) with wide pH tolerance range (pH3.0~9.0). The extracellular polysaccharides extracted from YDFF had no antibacterial activity, but protease K could completely inactivate its antibacterial activity, indicating that the main antibacterial active substance in YDFF was protein. It was demonstrated that YDFF exhibited antibacterial activity by several ways including inhibiting the formation of biofilms, destroying the cell membrane integrity which resulted in the leakage of DNA, and increasing the concentration of intracellular ROS. Additionally, when YDFF was used combined with methicillin, the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) was significantly decreased to 0.38, indicating YDFF could reduce the antibiotic resistance of MRSA to methicillin. Taken together, YDFF exhibited good antibacterial activity on MRSA by inhibiting the biofilm formation, destroying membrane structure and increasing the intracellular ROS, and reduced the antibiotic resistance to methicillin, which would provide a theoretical basis for the use of postbiotics in food and medicine. © 2023 The Author(s).

引用

页码：154 / 161

页数：7

共 36 条

[1] SALMINEN S, COLLADO M C, ENDO A, Et al., The International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics （ISAPP）consensus statement on the definition and scope of postbiotics[J], Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 18, 9, pp. 649-667, (2021)
[2] HOSSAIN M I, MIZAN M F R, ROY P K, Et al., Listeria monocytogenes biofilm inhibition on food contact surfaces by application of postbiotics from Lactobacillus curvatus B. 67 and Lactobacillus plantarum M. 2[J], Food Research International, 148, (2021)
[3] TOUSHIK S H, PARK J H, KIM K, Et al., Antibiofilm efficacy of Leuconostoc mesenteroides J. 27-derived postbiotic and food-grade essential oils against Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli alone and in combination, and their application as a green preservative in the seafood industry[J], Food Research International, 156, (2022)
[4] DARWISH M S, QIU L, TAHER M A, Et al., Health benefits of postbiotics produced by E. coli nissle 1917 in functional Yogurt enriched with cape gooseberry （Physalis peruviana L）[J], Fermentation, 8, 3, (2022)
[5] ZOLLKIEWICZ J, MARZEC A, Et al., Postbiotics—a step beyond pre-and probiotics[J], Nutrients, 12, 8, (2020)
[6] AGHEBATI-MALEKI L, HASANNEZHAD P, ABBASI A, Et al., Antibacterial, antiviral, antioxidant, and anticancer activities of postbiotics：A review of mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives [J], Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry, 12, pp. 2629-2645, (2021)
[7] PUCCETTI M, XIROUDAKI S, RICCI M, Et al., Postbiotic-enabled targeting of the host-microbiota-pathogen interface：Hints of antibiotic decline?[J], Pharmaceutics, 12, 7, (2020)
[8] ABD E G, WAFAA A., Paraprobiotics and postbiotics：Contemporary and promising natural antibiotics alternatives and their applications in the poultry field[J], Open Veterinary Journal, 10, 3, pp. 323-330, (2020)
[9] LI S H, LIU C J, REN B B, Et al., Comparison of bacteriostatic activity and main organic acid composition of fermentation broth of different Lactobacillus plantarum[J], Food Science, 40, 5, pp. 8-16, (2019)
[10] XU C, FU Y, LIU F, Et al., Purification and antimicrobial mechanism of a novel bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus rhamnosus 1.0320[J], LWT, 137, (2021)

← 1 2 3 4 →