Experimental study of single slope solar still coupled with parabolic trough collector

被引:0
作者
Kumar A. [1 ,2 ]
Vyas S. [3 ]
Nchelatebe Nkwetta D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delhi Technological University, 110 042, Delhi
[2] Centre for Energy and Environment, Delhi Technological University, 110 042, Delhi
[3] School of Energy & Environment Management, RGPV, Bhopal
[4] Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT), School of Applied Sciences and Technology, Department of Infrastructure and Sustainable Design, 11762-106 Street NW, Edmonton, T5G 2R1, AB
关键词
Annual energy output; Carbon credit; Carbon mitigation; CO[!sub]2[!/sub] mitigation; Desalination; Embodied energy; Enviro-economic analysis; Parabolic trough collector; Pay back period; Solar still;
D O I
10.1016/j.mset.2020.07.005
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
After a comprehensive review, it was found that very few research has been conducted on single slope solar still coupled with parabolic trough collector. In this research article, the behavior of parabolic trough collector integrated solar still was experimentally evaluated. An experimental study dealing with the energy analysis of a single slope solar still coupled with a parabolic trough collector was investigated for three different brine depths (5 cm, 10 cm and 15 cm) and results are presented. Three different brine depths of 5 cm, 10 cm and 15 cm water level were configured for flow rates of 4.1 l/m2, 3.645 l/m2 and 3.2 l/m2, respectively and daily productivity was investigated. The energy analysis includes annual energy output, energy payback period, CO2 mitigation, and embodied energy. It was observed that the annual energy output, energy payback time and CO2 mitigation decrease with increasing water depth while a reduction in water level from 15 cm to 5 cm showed an increased in daily energy yield of 22%. The embodied energy of the experimental setup is estimated at 856.72 kWh, and 5 cm of water depth resulted in the highest range of carbon credit earned (₹10,169.86–₹40,679.44). Energy and economic analysis were also conducted for parabolic trough collector integrated solar still to evaluate the viability of the developed system. The payback period of the setup was found to be 246 days, 253 days, and 341 days at 5 cm, 10 cm and 15 cm water level, respectively. © 2020
引用
收藏
页码:700 / 708
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Agrawal A., Rana R.S., Srivastava P.K.
  • [2] Singh D.B., Tiwari G.N., Al-helal I.M., Dwivedi V.K., Yadav J.K., Effect of energy matrices on life cycle cost analysis of passive solar stills, Sol. Energy, 134, pp. 9-22, (2016)
  • [3] Fathy M., Hassan H., Ahmed M.S., Experimental study on the e ff ect of coupling parabolic trough collector with double slope solar still on its performance, Sol. Energy, 163, pp. 54-61, (2018)
  • [4] Al-harahsheh M., Abu-arabi M., Mousa H., Alzghoul Z., Solar desalination using solar still enhanced by external solar collector and PCM, Appl. Therm. Eng., 128, pp. 1030-1040, (2018)
  • [5] El-Sebaii A.A., El-Bialy E., Advanced designs of solar desalination systems: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 49, pp. 1198-1212, (2015)
  • [6] Chandrashekara M., Yadav A., Water desalination system using solar heat: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 67, pp. 1308-1330, (2017)
  • [7] Rashidi S., Bovand M., Rahbar N., Abolfazli J., Steps optimization and productivity enhancement in a nano fluid cascade solar still, Renewable Energy, 118, pp. 536-545, (2018)
  • [8] Winfred D.D., Iniyan S., Suganthi L., Davies P.A., Solar stills: a comprehensive review of designs, performance and material advances, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 63, pp. 464-496, (2016)
  • [9] Kumar P.V., Kumar A., Prakash O., Kumar A., Solar stills system design: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 51, pp. 153-181, (2015)
  • [10] Vendra R., Kumar S., Hasan M.M., Khan M.E., Tiwari G.N., Performance of a solar still integrated with evacuated tube collector in natural mode, Desalination, 318, pp. 25-33, (2013)