Review of seismic performance and design methods for steel concentrically braced frames

被引:0
作者
Zhang W. [1 ,2 ]
Li H. [1 ,2 ]
Zeng L. [1 ,2 ]
Zhao Z. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Key Lab of Structural Dynamic Behavior and Control(Harbin Institute of Technology), Ministry of Education, Harbin
[2] Key Lab of Smart Prevention and Mitigation of Civil Engineering Disasters(Harbin Institute of Technology), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin
来源
Harbin Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology | 2021年 / 53卷 / 04期
关键词
Concentrically braced frames; Literature review; Low cycle fatigue life; Reserved capacities; Seismic design method;
D O I
10.11918/202004062
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents a state-of-the-art review on recent researches of seismic performance of steel concentrically braced frames and the seismic design methods in codes of practice of China and other countries, aiming at facilitating a safer and more cost-effective design and application of steel concentrically braced frames with single lateral resistant system. Limitations in current Chinese codes are discussed. It is pointed out that the low cycle fatigue performance of braces and their connections is not fully considered for steel concentrically braced frames, and there is no difference between the seismic design methods for structures with high ductility and low ductility. The contributions of semi-rigid connection of beam-column joints, vertical continuity of columns, and semi-rigid connection of column base bolts on the reserved capacities of steel concentrically braced frames with low ductility are neglected. To address these problems, following suggestions have been put forward. It is necessary to further investigate the low cycle fatigue life of braces and their connections and establish the seismic design principle to better match the low cycle fatigue life of braces and their connections. The capacity curve and low cycle fatigue damage of steel concentrically braced frames with high ductility should be analyzed to understand the laws of reduction level of seismic force and the demand of low cycle fatigue cumulative hysteresis energy. By combining force-based and energy-based design, a more reasonable seismic calculation method can be proposed. Structural reserved capacities for seismic resistance should be quantified to construct seismic design methods for steel concentrically braced frames with low ductility, so as to extend its application. Copyright ©2021 Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology.All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:8
相关论文
共 52 条
[11]  
ZHANG Yaochun, LIAN Weian, ZHANG Wenyuan, Factors affecting the low cycle fatigue behavior around the weak axis of welded Ⅰ-section bracing members, Key Engineering Materials, 324, 2, (2006)
[12]  
ZHANG Yaochun, LIAN Weian, ZHANG Wenyuan, The low-cycle fatigue tests of welded Ⅰ-section bracing members, Journal of Building Structures, 26, 6, (2005)
[13]  
ZENG Lijing, ZHANG Wenyuan, DING Yukun, Representative strain-based fatigue and fracture evaluation of Ⅰ-shaped steel bracing members using the fiber model, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 160, (2019)
[14]  
WIJESUNDARA K K, NASCIMBEBE R, SULLIVAN T J., Equivalent viscous damping for steel concentrically braced frame structures, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 9, 5, (2011)
[15]  
SANTAGATI S, BOLOGNINI D, NASCIMBENE R., Strain life analysis at low-cycle fatigue on concentrically braced steel structures with RHS shape braces, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 16, S, (2012)
[16]  
LEHMAN D E, ROEDER C W, HERMAN D., Improved seismic performance of gusset plate connections, Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), 134, 6, (2008)
[17]  
GOGGINS J, BRODERICK B M, ELGHAZOULI A Y, Et al., Shake table testing of concentrically braced steel structures with realistic connection details subjected to earthquakes, Structures, 13, 3, (2018)
[18]  
(2007)
[19]  
KIM J, CHOI H., Response modification factors of chevron-braced frames, Engineering Structures, 27, 2, (2005)
[20]  
ZHAI Changhai, XIE Lili, State of art of applications of strength reduction factors in seismic design codes, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 26, 2, (2006)