Concurrent fault diagnosis method based on belief rule base

被引:0
|
作者
Lei J. [1 ]
Xu X. [1 ]
Xu X. [1 ]
Chang L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou
来源
Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics | 2020年 / 42卷 / 02期
关键词
Attributes weight; Belief rule base (BRB); Concurrent fault; Trade-off analysis; Uncertainly;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.02.32
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To solve the problem of concurrent fault diagnosis with uncertainty, a belief rule base (BRB) diagnosis method based on attribute weights and tradeoff analysis is proposed. In the proposed method, the attribute weights are used to represent the correlation between the attributes and the specific failure mode, and an optimization algorithm via differential evolution (DE) which can reflect fault model constraints is designed. The concurrency fault mode diagnosis is completed by the trade-off analysis between the adjacent fault mode belief and the preset threshold. This method only needs to construct a single BRB to effectively deal with various uncertainty information, which greatly reduces the modeling complexity compared with the existing research methods. The diagnosis results can not only get the concurrency of the faults but also distinguish the main fault and the minor fault. The modeling and reasoning process is open and interpretable. Finally, the concurrent fault diagnosis of a marine diesel engine is taken as an example and proves the proposed method can effectively diagnose the concurrent faults with good stability. © 2020, Editorial Office of Systems Engineering and Electronics. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 504
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Xu X.J., Yang X.P., Sheng C.X., Et al., A belief rule-based expert system for fault diagnosis of marine diesel engines, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, pp. 1-17, (2017)
  • [2] Zhou Z.J., Hu G.Y., Zhang B.C., Et al., A model for hidden behavior prediction of complex systems based on belief rule base and power set, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 48, 9, pp. 1649-1655, (2017)
  • [3] Peng K.X., Ma L., Zhang K., Review of quality-related fault detection and diagnosis techniques for complex industrial processes, Acta Automatica Sinica, 43, 3, pp. 349-365, (2017)
  • [4] Zhang T., Wang J.B., Zhang T., Fault fuzzy diagnosis based on correlation matrix and probability model, Systems Engineering and Electronics, 40, 2, pp. 346-352, (2018)
  • [5] Wan L.Q., Chen H.Z., Ouyang L.H., Response surface methodology-based hybrid robust design optimization for complex product under mixed uncertainties, Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 30, 2, pp. 308-318, (2019)
  • [6] Chen C., Du Z.J., Liang X.X., Et al., Modeling and solution based on stochastic games for development of COA under uncertainty, Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 30, 2, pp. 288-296, (2019)
  • [7] Daroogheh N., Meskin N., Khorasani K., A dual particle filter-based fault diagnosis scheme for nonlinear systems, IEEE Trans. on Control Systems Technology, 26, 4, pp. 1317-1334, (2017)
  • [8] Vong C.M., Wong P.K., Ip W.F., Et al., Simultaneous-fault diagnosis of automotive engine ignition systems using prior domain knowledge and relevance vector machine, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 5, pp. 1-19, (2013)
  • [9] Yang Y.N., Yan Y., Backstepping sliding mode control for uncertain strict-feedback nonlinear systems using neural-network-based adaptive gain scheduling, Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 29, 3, pp. 580-586, (2018)
  • [10] Li X., Cai J., Zuo H.F., Et al., Joint optimization of sampling interval and control for condition-based maintenance using availability maximization criterion, Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 29, 1, pp. 203-215, (2018)