Climate change impacts of bioenergy technologies: A comparative consequential LCA of sustainable fuels production with CCUS

被引:3
|
作者
Krogh, Andreas [1 ]
Junginger, Martin [2 ]
Shen, Li [2 ]
Grue, Jeppe [3 ]
Pedersen, Thomas H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Energy, Pontoppidanstr 111, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] COWI A S Green Fuels & Energy, Visionsvej 53, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Bioenergy; CCS; CCU; Life cycle assessment; Biocrude; Methanol; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; BIOFUEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173660
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The use of sustainable biomass can be a cost-effective way of reducing the greenhouse gas emissions in the maritime and aviation sectors. Biomass, however, is a limited resource, and therefore, it is important to use the biomass where it creates the highest value, not only economically, but also in terms of GHG reductions. This study comprehensively evaluates the GHG reduction potential of utilising forestry residue in different bioenergy technologies using a consequential LCA approach. Unlike previous studies that assess GHG impacts per unit of fuel produced, this research takes a feedstock-centric approach which enables comparisons across systems that yield diverse products and by-products. Three technologies-combined heat and power plant with carbon capture, hydrothermal liquefaction, and gasification-are assessed, while considering both carbon capture and storage (CCS) or carbon capture and utilisation (CCU). Through scenario analysis, the study addresses uncertainty, and assumptions in the LCA modelling. It explores the impact of energy systems, fuel substitution efficiency, renewable energy expansion, and the up/down stream supply chain. All technology pathways showed a potential for net emissions savings when including avoided emissions from substitution of products, with results varying from -111 to -1742 kgCO(2eq) per tonne residue. When combining the bioenergy technologies with CCU the dependency on the energy system in which they are operated was a significantly higher compared to CCS. The breakpoint was found to be 44 kg CO2(eq)/kWh electricity meaning that the marginal electricity mix has to be below this point for CCU to obtain lower GHG emissions. Furthermore, it is evident that the environmental performance of CCU technologies is highly sensitive to how it will affect the ongoing expansion of renewable electricity capacity.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How Sustainable Transportation Can Utilize Climate Change Technologies to Mitigate Climate Change
    Din, Ashraf Ud
    Ur Rahman, Imran
    Vega-Munoz, Alejandro
    Elahi, Ehsan
    Salazar-Sepulveda, Guido
    Contreras-Barraza, Nicolas
    Alhrahsheh, Rakan Radi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [22] Adapting to the health impacts of climate change in a sustainable manner
    Hoy, Damian
    Roth, Adam
    Lepers, Christelle
    Durham, Jo
    Bell, Johann
    Durand, Alexis
    Lal, Padma Narsey
    Souares, Yvan
    GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2014, 10
  • [23] Adapting to the health impacts of climate change in a sustainable manner
    Damian Hoy
    Adam Roth
    Christelle Lepers
    Jo Durham
    Johann Bell
    Alexis Durand
    Padma Narsey Lal
    Yvan Souares
    Globalization and Health, 10
  • [24] Modelling approaches for consequential life-cycle assessment (C-LCA) of bioenergy: Critical review and proposed framework for biogas production
    Marvuglia, Antonino
    Benetto, Enrico
    Rege, Sameer
    Jury, Colin
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 25 : 768 - 781
  • [25] Sustainable Steel Production: A Comprehensive LCA Approach for Reducing Environmental Costs and Impacts
    Aref Ahmadian Baghbadarani
    Khosro Ashrafi
    Abdolreza Karbassi
    Materials Circular Economy, 2025, 7 (1):
  • [26] Agriculture, bioenergy, and water implications of constrained cereal trade and climate change impacts
    Zhang, Ying
    Waldhoff, Stephanie
    Wise, Marshall
    Edmonds, Jae
    Patel, Pralit
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (09):
  • [27] Quantifying biodiversity impacts of climate change and bioenergy: the role of integrated global scenarios
    Meller, Laura
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Cabeza, Mar
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2015, 15 (06) : 961 - 971
  • [28] Bioenergy with carbon capture, storage and utilization: Potential technologies to mitigate climate change
    Ganeshan, Prabakaran
    Vigneswaran, V. S.
    Gowd, Sarath C.
    Mishra, Rahul
    Singh, Ekta
    Kumar, Aman
    Kumar, Sunil
    Pugazhendhi, Arivalagan
    Rajendran, Karthik
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2023, 177
  • [29] Predicting potential climate change impacts of bioenergy from perennial grasses in 2050
    Liu, Weiguo
    Wang, Kui
    Hao, Hongke
    Yan, Yan
    Zhang, Han
    Zhang, Huanling
    Peng, Changhui
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2023, 190
  • [30] Quantifying biodiversity impacts of climate change and bioenergy: the role of integrated global scenarios
    Laura Meller
    Detlef P. van Vuuren
    Mar Cabeza
    Regional Environmental Change, 2015, 15 : 961 - 971