Intersecting imaginaries: Visions of decentralized autonomous systems

被引:22
作者
Lustig C. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Washington, 428 Sieg Hall, Campus Box 352315, Seattle, 98195, WA
关键词
Autonomous systems; Bitcoin; Blockchain; Decentralized autonomous systems; Distributed systems; Imaginaries; Participatory design;
D O I
10.1145/3359312
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sociotechnical imaginaries are futures that people envision might be possible and desirable. They have a real impact on how systems are designed and what values they have embedded in their design. This article examines imaginaries about autonomous systems, decentralized systems, and decentralized autonomous systems. Through a discussion of the literature on autonomous and decentralized systems and how these imaginaries play out in the blockchain community based on my qualitative research, I demonstrate how decentralized autonomous systems are related to imaginaries about the organization of and the future of work. I identify three framings of imaginaries about autonomous systems: (1) autonomous technology as physical objects, (2) as mathematical rules, and (3) as artificial mangers. I also identify two sometimes conflicting framings of imaginaries about distributed and decentralized technology: these technologies as a new form of production and as freedom from control. These imaginaries intersect in decentralized autonomous systems, and I examine what they can tell us about the design and governance of such technologies. Lastly, I suggest ways of using the concept of imaginaries in participatory design. © 2019 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 125 条
[41]  
Flichy P., The Internet Imaginaire, (2007)
[42]  
Folkinshteyn D., Lennon M., Reilly T., A tale of twin tech: Bitcoin and the WWW, Journal of Strategic and International Studies X, 2, pp. 82-90, (2015)
[43]  
Ford B., Delegative Democracy Revisited, (2014)
[44]  
Galloway A.R., Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization, (2004)
[45]  
Garrod J.Z., The real world of the Decentralized autonomous society. Triplec: Communication, capitalism & Critique, Open Access Journal for A Global Sustainable Information Society, 14, 1, pp. 62-77, (2016)
[46]  
Garzik J., Bitcoin-Development] Block Size Increase, (2015)
[47]  
Gershenfeld N., Krikorian R., Cohen D., The internet of things, Scientific American, 291, 4, pp. 76-81, (2004)
[48]  
Gillespie T., Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media, (2018)
[49]  
Gillespie T., Seaver N., Critical Algorithm Studies: A Reading List, (2016)
[50]  
Graeber D., Strike! Magazine – on the phenomenon of bullshit jobs, STRIKE! Magazine, 3, (2013)