Intersecting imaginaries: Visions of decentralized autonomous systems

被引:22
作者
Lustig C. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Washington, 428 Sieg Hall, Campus Box 352315, Seattle, 98195, WA
关键词
Autonomous systems; Bitcoin; Blockchain; Decentralized autonomous systems; Distributed systems; Imaginaries; Participatory design;
D O I
10.1145/3359312
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sociotechnical imaginaries are futures that people envision might be possible and desirable. They have a real impact on how systems are designed and what values they have embedded in their design. This article examines imaginaries about autonomous systems, decentralized systems, and decentralized autonomous systems. Through a discussion of the literature on autonomous and decentralized systems and how these imaginaries play out in the blockchain community based on my qualitative research, I demonstrate how decentralized autonomous systems are related to imaginaries about the organization of and the future of work. I identify three framings of imaginaries about autonomous systems: (1) autonomous technology as physical objects, (2) as mathematical rules, and (3) as artificial mangers. I also identify two sometimes conflicting framings of imaginaries about distributed and decentralized technology: these technologies as a new form of production and as freedom from control. These imaginaries intersect in decentralized autonomous systems, and I examine what they can tell us about the design and governance of such technologies. Lastly, I suggest ways of using the concept of imaginaries in participatory design. © 2019 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 125 条
[11]  
Bjogvinsson E., Ehn P., Hillgren P.-A., Design things and design thinking: Contemporary participatory design challenges, Design Issues, 28, 3, pp. 101-116, (2012)
[12]  
Bleecker J., Design fiction. A short essay on design, science, fact and fiction, Near Future Laboratory, (2009)
[13]  
Blum C., Zuber C.I., Liquid democracy: Potentials, problems, and perspectives, Journal of Political Philosophy, 24, (2015)
[14]  
Blythe M., Research fiction: Storytelling, plot and design, Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’17), pp. 5400-5411, (2017)
[15]  
Brunton F., Coleman G., Closer to the metal, Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, pp. 77-97, (2014)
[16]  
Bucher T., Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook, New Media & Society, 14, 7, pp. 1164-1180, (2012)
[17]  
Buterin V., Bootstrapping A Decentralized Autonomous Corporation: Part I, (2013)
[18]  
Buterin V., DAOs, DACs, DAs and More: An Incomplete Terminology Guide, (2014)
[19]  
Buterin V., An Introduction to Futarchy, (2014)
[20]  
Buterin V., Frank S., Conversation | Decentralized Autonomous Society with Vitalik Buterin and Sam Frank, (2014)