The role of small-scale and community-based projects in future development of the marine energy sector

被引:0
作者
Proimakis N. [1 ,2 ]
Hooper T. [1 ]
Østergaard P.A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth
[2] Aalborg University, Rendsburggade 14, Aalborg
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Canada; Europe; Financial mechanisms; Governance; Policy; Tidal energy;
D O I
10.5278/ijsepm.6657
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite high expectations for the sector, most marine energy technologies remain in the research and development, or at best demonstration, phase. The industry is in a period of stagnation, and requires new approaches to overcome the challenges that inhibit widespread deployment. Small-scale initiatives have proven to be a successful means of developing other renewable technologies but their role in supporting marine energy is not well researched. This paper provides a review of the barriers and opportunities presented by different policy landscapes, financial support mechanisms, markets, key actors, and wider regulatory and governance issues. Semi-structured interviews with marine energy stakeholders from the UK, Canada and Denmark were used to explore the role of small-scale marine energy projects, and were supplemented by interviews with the general public in England. This showed that while marine energy is appropriately scalable for local projects, financing remains a major hurdle. Discretionary local authority finance, as well as other novel options such as crowdfunding, tends to be relatively modest, supporting the argument for small-scale projects. A market for smaller devices exists, particularly for remote communities currently dependent on expensive energy from oil-fired generators. There remains a significant role for small-scale projects in testing the technology, contributing to reductions in cost and environmental risk. Current processes for environmental impact assessment can present a significant hurdle for small projects, but proportionate, adaptive assessments are evolving. Finally, community ownership and public participation have the potential to increase advocacy for the industry, with multi-actor partnerships presenting a positive way forward. © 2021, Aalborg University press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 166
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[11]  
Ruano-Chamorro C, Castilla JC, Gelcich S., Human dimensions of marine hydrokinetic energies: Current knowledge and research gaps, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, pp. 1-11, (2017)
[12]  
O'Hagan AM, Huertas C, O'Callaghan J, Greaves D., Wave energy in Europe: Views on experiences and progress to date, Int J Mar Energy, 14, pp. 180-197, (2016)
[13]  
Wright G, O'Hagan AM, de Groot J, Leroy Y, Soininen N, Salcido R, Et al., Establishing a legal research agenda for ocean energy, Mar Policy, 63, pp. 126-134, (2016)
[14]  
Hvelplund F, Ostergaard PA, Meyer NI., Incentives and barriers for wind power expansion and system integration in Denmark, Energy Policy, 107, (2017)
[15]  
Lange M, O'Hagan AM, Devoy RRN, Le Tissier M, Cummins V., Governance barriers to sustainable energy transitions – Assessing Ireland’s capacity towards marine energy futures, Energy Policy, 113, pp. 623-632, (2018)
[16]  
Lange M, Page G, Cummins V., Governance challenges of marine renewable energy developments in the U.S. – Creating the enabling conditions for successful project development, Mar Policy, 90, pp. 37-46, (2018)
[17]  
Wright G., Marine governance in an industrialised ocean: A case study of the emerging marine renewable energy industry, Mar Policy, 52, pp. 77-84, (2015)
[18]  
Wright G., Regulating wave and tidal energy: An industry perspective on the Scottish marine governance framework, Mar Policy, 65, pp. 115-126, (2016)
[19]  
Magnani N, Osti G., Does civil society matter? Challenges and strategies of grassroots initiatives in Italy’s energy transition, Energy Res Soc Sci, 13, pp. 148-157, (2016)
[20]  
Arentsen M, Bellekom S., Power to the people: local energy initiatives as seedbeds of innovation?, Energy Sustain Soc, 4, (2014)