Transparency in persuasive technology, immersive technology, and online marketing: Facilitating users’ informed decision making and practical implications

被引:1
作者
Wang R. [1 ,2 ]
Bush-Evans R. [2 ]
Arden-Close E. [2 ]
Bolat E. [3 ]
McAlaney J. [2 ]
Hodge S. [2 ]
Thomas S. [4 ]
Phalp K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Poole House P104a, Poole
[2] Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University
[3] Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University
关键词
Immersive technology; Impact on user; Informed decision making; Online marketing; Persuasive technology; transparency;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2022.107545
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the current age of emerging technologies and big data, transparency has become an important issue for technology users and online consumers. However, there is a lack of consensus on what constitutes transparency across domains of research, not to mention transparency guidelines for designers and marketers. In this review, we explored the question of what transparency means in current research and practices by reviewing the literature in three domains: persuasive technology, immersive technology and online marketing. Literature reviewed, including both empirical research and position articles, covered multidisciplinary areas including computer science and information technology, psychology, healthcare, human computer interaction, business and management, law and public health. In this paper, we summarized our findings through a framework of transparency and provided insights into the different aspects of transparency, categorized into ten themes (i.e., Organizational Transparency, Information Transparency, Transparency of System Design, Data Privacy and Informed Consent, Transparency of Online Advertising, Potential Risks, User Autonomy, Informed Decision Making, Information Visualization, Personalization and User-centered design) along three dimensions (i.e., Types of transparency, Impact on User and Potential Solutions). Addressing aspects of transparency will facilitate users’ autonomy and contribute to their informed decision making. © 2022 The Authors
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 149 条
[31]  
Cornell University Library, BEE 3299: Sustainable Development: Google vs. Web of Science (and other library databases), what's the difference?, (2020)
[32]  
Correia F., Martins A., Waikel A., Online financing without fintech: Evidence from online informal loans, Journal of Economics and Business, 121, (2022)
[33]  
D'Alfonso S., Phillips J., Valentine L., Gleeson J., Alvarez-Jimenez M., Moderated online social therapy: Viewpoint on the ethics and design principles of a web-based therapy system, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21, 12, (2019)
[34]  
Deci E.L., Ryan R.M., The “ what ” and “ why ” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior, Psychological Inquiry, 11, 4, pp. 227-268, (2000)
[35]  
Dijksterhuis A., Aarts H., Smith P.K., The power of the subliminal: On subliminal persuasion and other potential applications, The new unconscious, pp. 1-51, (2005)
[36]  
DiStaso M.W., Bortree D.S., Multi-method analysis of transparency in social media practices: Survey, interviews and content analysis, Public Relations Review, 38, 3, pp. 511-514, (2012)
[37]  
Dodoo N.A., Youn S., Snapping and chatting away: Consumer motivations for and outcomes of interacting with Snapchat AR ad lens, Telematics and Informatics, 57, (2020)
[38]  
Drosatos G., Nalbadis F., Arden-Close E.J., Baines V., Bolat E., Vuillier L., Kostoulas T., Budka M., Wasowska S., Bonello M., Brown J., Corner T., McAlaney J., Phalp K., Ali R., Enabling responsible online gambling by real-time persuasive technologies, Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly, 17, pp. 44-68, (2018)
[39]  
Ehninger D., Contemporary rhetoric: A reader's coursebook. Glenview, IL: Scott, foresman and company, (1972)
[40]  
Ellison N., Hardey M., Social media and local government: Citizenship, consumption and democracy, Local Government Studies, 40, 1, pp. 21-40, (2014)