Uncertainty Quantification of RF Circuits Using Stochastic Collocation Techniques

被引:6
作者
Chordia A. [1 ]
Tripathi J.N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Department of Electrical Engineering, Rajasthan, Jodhpur
关键词
Interpolation; LC CMOS Oscillator; Linear Regression; Low Noise Amplifier; Polynomial Chaos Expansion; Pseudo-spectral projection; Stochastic Collocation; Uncertainty Quantification;
D O I
10.1109/MEMC.2022.9780345
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents a study on the Polynomial Chaos based approach for uncertainty quantification. It discusses employing different polynomial chaos based techniques for uncertainty quantification of RF circuits. Here, the performance of different Stochastic Collocation techniques such as the pseudo-spectral projection, linear regression, and interpolation technique, is investigated using two illustrative circuit examples. The first example deals with the uncertainty quantification of phase noise in a 2.4 GHz CMOS LC tank oscillator, while in the second one, gain of a 2.4 GHz low-noise amplifier is analyzed in the presence of uncertainty. The applied techniques are investigated and compared with the traditional Monte Carlo simulations approach. The advantages and disadvantages of each of the presented techniques are discussed, which are validated using the illustrations. The results of our study provide guidance for choosing the appropriate technique for modeling and quantifying uncertainty for similar circuits. © 2012 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 56
页数:11
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Wong S., Et al., A cmos mismatch model and scaling effects, IEEE Electron Device Letters, 18, 6, pp. 261-263, (1997)
[2]  
Chandrakasan A., Bowhill W.J., Fox F., Models of Process Variations in Device and Interconnect. 1em plus 0.5em minus 0.4em, pp. 98-115, (2001)
[3]  
Masuda H., Et al., Challenge: variability characterization and modeling for 65-to 90-nm processes, Proceedings of the IEEE 2005 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2005., pp. 593-599, (2005)
[4]  
Drennan P.G., McAndrew C.C., Understanding mosfet mismatch for analog design, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 38, 3, pp. 450-456, (2003)
[5]  
Larbi M., Besnier P., Pecqueux B., The adaptive controlled stratification method applied to the determination of extreme interference levels in EMC modeling with uncertain input variables, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 58, 2, pp. 543-552, (2016)
[6]  
Probability of EMC failure and sensitivity analysis with regard to uncertain variables by reliability methods, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 57, 2, pp. 274-282, (2015)
[7]  
Merizgui T., Hadjadj A., Kious M., Gaoui B., Impact of temperature variation on the electromagnetic shielding behavior of multilayer shield for EMC applications, Revue des Composites et des Matériaux Avancés, 29, 6, (2019)
[8]  
DiBene J., Knighten J.L., Effects of device variations on the EMI potential of high speed digital integrated circuits, IEEE 1997, EMC, Austin Style. IEEE 1997 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Symposium Record (Cat. No. 97CH36113). IEEE, pp. 208-212, (1997)
[9]  
DiBene J., Knighten J., Effects of device variations on the EMI potential of high speed digital integrated circuits, IEEE 1997, EMC, Austin Style. IEEE 1997 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Symposium Record (Cat. No.97CH36113), pp. 208-212, (1997)
[10]  
Abu-Rahma M.H., Anis M., Variability in VLSI circuits: Sources and design considerations, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pp. 3215-3218, (2007)