Study on array laterolog response simulation and mud-filtrate invasion correction

被引:0
作者
Zhao P. [1 ,2 ]
Qin R. [3 ]
Pan H. [1 ]
Ostadhassan M. [2 ]
Wu Y. [4 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan
[2] Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, 58201, ND
[3] Three Gorges Geotechnical Consultants Co., Ltd., Changjiang Institute of Survey, Planning, Design and Research, Wuhan
[4] Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, 82071, WY
来源
Advances in Geo-Energy Research | 2019年 / 3卷 / 02期
关键词
Array laterolog; Finite element method; Mud-filtrate invasion; Numerical simulation;
D O I
10.26804/ager.2019.02.07
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is a complicated task to evaluate the reservoirs influenced by mud-filtrate invasion. This study presents numerical simulation results of array laterolog response and the approach for mud-filtrate invasion correction. Considering differential equations and boundary conditions of the steady current field in the rock medium, finite element method is utilized to solve the Laplace equation. Then the potential value at each node is calculated along with the apparent resistivity of six measuring modes of array laterolog. Based on the numerical results, the array laterolog response is affected by various parameters including borehole radius, mud-filtrate resistivity, mud-filtrate invasion radius and invaded zone resistivity. Correction charts for borehole and mud-filtrate invasion are developed to accurately obtain the mud-filtrate invasion depth and the true resistivity of the uninvaded formation. The correction chart has been applied to the real array laterolog data of a sandstone reservoir, which the corrected resistivity is closer to the true formation resistivity. © The Author(s) 2019.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 186
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Abdel-Shafy T., Fattah A.A., Corley B., Et al., Comparison of a new multi laterolog tool and a formation resistivity imager in the Phiops Field of Egypt, SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, (2011)
  • [2] Chen Y., Chew W.C., Zhang G., A novel array laterolog method, The Log Analyst, 39, 5, pp. 23-32, (1998)
  • [3] Deng S., Fan Y., Li Z., Et al., Response characteristics of array lateral logs and their primary inversion in reservoirs with fracture-induced anisotropy, Pet. Sci, 8, 1, pp. 11-16, (2011)
  • [4] Deng S., Li Z., Fan Y., Et al., Numerical simulation of mud-filtrate invasion and its array laterolog response in deviated wells, Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 53, 4, pp. 994-1000, (2010)
  • [5] Dun Y., Tang Z., Zhang F., Et al., Fast calculation and characteristic analysis of array lateral-logging responses, Int. J. Appl. Electrom. Mech, 33, 1-2, pp. 145-151, (2010)
  • [6] Frenkel M.A., Walker M.J., Impact of array lateral logs on saturation estimations in two exploration wells from Australia, SPWLA 42nd Annual Logging Symposium, (2001)
  • [7] Galli M.T., Gonfalini M., Mele M., Et al., Resistivity modeling of array laterolog tools: An application in an offshore Norway clastic reservoir, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, (2002)
  • [8] Griffiths R., Barber T., Faivre O., Optimal evaluation of formation resistivities using array induction and array laterolog tools, SPWLA 41st Annual Logging Symposium, (2000)
  • [9] Griffiths R., Smits J.W., Faivre O., Et al., Better saturation from new array laterolog, SPWLA 40th Annual Logging Symposium, (1999)
  • [10] He F., Ma X., Feng L., HAL6505 array laterolog logging tool, Oil Forum, 32, 2, pp. 59-61, (2013)