Numerical Study on Spray Characteristics of Kerosene Jet in a Crossflow

被引:0
|
作者
He Y.-Y. [1 ,2 ]
Yu X.-B. [2 ]
Wang Z.-H. [2 ]
Li J.-H. [1 ]
Yan Y.-W. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing
[2] AECC Guiyang Engine Design Research Institute, Guiyang
来源
关键词
Adaptive mesh refinement; Jet trajectory; Kerosene atomization; Primary breakup; Secondary breakup; SMD;
D O I
10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.210756
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to study the fragmentation shape and development track of fuel jet atomization process,and realize the accurate numerical simulation of fuel atomization process,atomization characteristics of a direct jet in a cross flow were numerically investigated. A couped Volume-of-Fluid(VOF)and discrete phase model (DPM)method was adopted to study the deformation and development of jet in the process of primary breakup,and to track the spatial distribution characteristics of Sauter mean diameter(SMD)of fuel droplets in the process of secondary. The adaptive mesh refinement(AMR)technique was applied to accurately capture the liquid structures and wave behaviour on liquid surface. The numerical results show as follows:column breakup and surface shearing breakup are dominant in primary breakup process of liquid jet. Breakup modes are highly influenced by Weber number,and the jet trajectory is obviously affected by the momentum ratio of liquid to gas. The fuel jet trajectory and droplet spatial distribution are in good agreement with the classical empirical relations and experimental data under different aerodynamic inlet conditions. © 2023 Journal of Propulsion Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Duronio F,, De Vita A,, Montanaro A, Et al., Gasoline Direct Injection Engines-A Review of Latest Technologies and Trends. Part 1:Spray Breakup Process[J], Fuel, 265, (2020)
  • [2] Liu N, Wang Z, Sun M,, Et al., Simulation of Liquid Jet Primary Breakup in a Supersonic Crossflow under Adaptive Mesh Refinement Framework[J], Aerospace Science and Technology, 91, pp. 456-473, (2019)
  • [3] Xiao F, Dianat M,, McGuirk J J., Large Eddy Simulation of Liquid-Jet Primary Breakup in Air Crossflow[J], AIAA Journal, 51, 12, pp. 2878-2893, (2013)
  • [4] Wu P K,, Kirkendall K A,, Fuller R P,, Et al., Breakup Processes of Liquid Jets in Subsonic Crossflows[J], Journal of Propulsion and Power, 13, 1, pp. 64-73, (1997)
  • [5] Xiang G, Ren Z, Kim S,, Et al., Numerical Analysis on the Disintegration of Gas-Liquid Interface in Two-Phase Shear-Layer Flows[J], Aerospace Science and Technology, 98, (2020)
  • [6] Salewshi M., A Comparison of Single and Multiphase Jets in a Crossflow Using Large Eddy Simulations[J], Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 129, 61, pp. 61-68, (2007)
  • [7] Madhusudan G P, Heinz P., Detailed Numerical Simulations of Primary Atomization of Liquid Jets in Crossflow
  • [8] LIU Ri-chao, LE Jia-ling, YANG Shun-hua, Et al., Direct Numerical Simulations of Atomization Processes of Liquid Jet in Subsonic Cross-Flow [J], Journal of Propulsion Technology, 37, 11, pp. 2135-2141, (2016)
  • [9] Olsson E, Kreiss G., A Conservative Level Set Method for Two Phase Flow[J], Journal of Computational Physics, 210, 1, pp. 225-246, (2005)
  • [10] Tsukamoto K,, Hirayama Y,, Oshima N,, Et al., Large Eddy Simulation of Spray Injection for Direct Injection Gasoline Engine[C], Orlando:47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, (2009)