Priorities for wind-waves research

被引：0

作者：

Greenslade D. ^{[1
]}

Hemer M. ^{[1
]}

Babanin A. ^{[1
]}

Lowe R. ^{[1
]}

Turner I. ^{[1
]}

Power H. ^{[1
]}

Young I. ^{[1
]}

Ierodiaconou D. ^{[1
]}

Hibbert G. ^{[1
]}

Williams G. ^{[1
]}

Aijaz S. ^{[1
]}

Albuquerque J. ^{[1
]}

Allen S. ^{[1
]}

Banner M. ^{[1
]}

Branson P. ^{[1
]}

Buchan S. ^{[1
]}

Burton A. ^{[1
]}

Bye J. ^{[1
]}

Cartwright N. ^{[1
]}

Chabchoub A. ^{[1
]}

Colberg F. ^{[1
]}

Contardo S. ^{[1
]}

Dufois F. ^{[1
]}

Earl-Spurr C. ^{[1
]}

Farr D. ^{[1
]}

Goodwin I. ^{[1
]}

Gunson J. ^{[1
]}

Hansen J. ^{[1
]}

Hanslow D. ^{[1
]}

Harley M. ^{[1
]}

Hetzel Y. ^{[1
]}

Hoeke R. ^{[1
]}

Jones N. ^{[1
]}

Kinsela M. ^{[1
]}

Liu Q. ^{[1
]}

Makarynskyy O. ^{[1
]}

Marcollo H. ^{[1
]}

Mazaheri S. ^{[1
]}

McConochie J. ^{[1
]}

Millar G. ^{[1
]}

Moltmann T. ^{[1
]}

Moodie N. ^{[1
]}

Morim J. ^{[1
]}

Morison R. ^{[1
]}

Orszaghova J. ^{[1
]}

Pattiaratchi C. ^{[1
]}

Pomeroy A. ^{[1
]}

Proctor R. ^{[1
]}

Provis D. ^{[1
]}

Reef R. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Bureau of Meteorology, Australia

来源：

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2020年 / 101卷 / 06期

关键词：

The Australian Forum for Operational Oceanography (FOO); started in 2015; established a working group to focus on wind-waves. One of the aims of this working group was to identify the key priorities of wind-waves research. This undertaking has been driven by Australian needs; but Australia is just one part of the larger international waves community; results of this process are also relevant to other marine-focused nations. The process to identify research priorities engaged both researchers and stakeholders in a democratic; collaborative; and iterative process. The main steps were 1) soliciting possible research questions via an online survey; 2) reviewing and editing the questions at a face-to-face workshop; and 3) ranking the research questions. A total of 360 survey invitations were emailed to possible participants; with 69 respondents. Half of these were from research organizations; and the remainder from private industry; service providers; or government. The survey gathered a list of ideas that were consolidated to 155 suggestions; which were further reviewed by participants at a wind-waves research symposium and then ranked via a voting process. A second round of online voting was then undertaken that specifically targeted the industry and stakeholder community. The top five priorities were identified; and are referred to here as tier 1 priorities. A further 10 priorities were identified; and are referred to here as tier 2; providing a total of 15 top-ranked priorities. © 2020 American Meteorological Society. All rights reserved;

D O I：

10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0262.A

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The Australian Forum for Operational Oceanography (FOO), started in 2015, established a working group to focus on wind-waves. One of the aims of this working group was to identify the key priorities of wind-waves research. This undertaking has been driven by Australian needs, but Australia is just one part of the larger international waves community; results of this process are also relevant to other marine-focused nations. The process to identify research priorities engaged both researchers and stakeholders in a democratic, collaborative, and iterative process. The main steps were 1) soliciting possible research questions via an online survey, 2) reviewing and editing the questions at a face-to-face workshop, and 3) ranking the research questions. A total of 360 survey invitations were emailed to possible participants, with 69 respondents. Half of these were from research organizations, and the remainder from private industry, service providers, or government. The survey gathered a list of ideas that were consolidated to 155 suggestions, which were further reviewed by participants at a wind-waves research symposium and then ranked via a voting process. A second round of online voting was then undertaken that specifically targeted the industry and stakeholder community. The top five priorities were identified, and are referred to here as “tier 1” priorities. A further 10 priorities were identified, and are referred to here as “tier 2,” providing a total of 15 top-ranked priorities. © 2020 American Meteorological Society. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：505 / 507

页数：2

共 50 条

[21] THE MICROSTRUCTURE OF THE BREAKING WIND-WAVES CRESTS
BORTKOVSKY, RS
TIMANOVSKY, DF
IZVESTIYA AKADEMII NAUK SSSR FIZIKA ATMOSFERY I OKEANA, 1982, 18 (03): : 327 - 329
[22] INTERACTIONS BETWEEN RAIN AND WIND-WAVES
POON, YK
TANG, S
WU, J
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY, 1992, 22 (09) : 976 - 987
[23] INTERACTION OF WIND-WAVES WITH VERTICAL WALL
CIESLIKIEWICZ, W
MASSEL, SR
JOURNAL OF WATERWAY PORT COASTAL AND OCEAN ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1988, 114 (05): : 653 - 672
[24] TRANSITION OF MECHANICALLY GENERATED REGULAR WAVES TO WIND-WAVES UNDER THE ACTION OF WIND
HATORI, M
TOBA, Y
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1983, 130 (MAY) : 397 - 409
[25] EFFECTS OF MUTUAL ADJUSTMENT OF WAVES AND WIND IN WEAKLY TURBULENT THEORY OF WIND-WAVES
ZASLAVSKII, MM
DOKLADY AKADEMII NAUK SSSR, 1989, 304 (05): : 1226 - 1230
[26] WIND-WAVES EVALUATION IN THE ADRIATIC AND MEDITERRANEAN SEAS
CAVALERI, L
BERTOTTI, L
LIONELLO, P
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 1989, 27 (01) : 57 - 69
[27] Research in nonlinear large-amplitude roll leading to capsize in wind-waves
Li, Yuan-Lin
Huanan Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science), 2001, 29 (06): : 91 - 96
[28] THE GENERATION OF WIND-WAVES AT THE INITIAL-STAGE
POKAZEEV, KV
VORONIN, LM
IZVESTIYA AKADEMII NAUK SSSR FIZIKA ATMOSFERY I OKEANA, 1982, 18 (08): : 889 - 892
[29] GROWTH AND EQUILIBRIUM OF WIND-WAVES IN A LABORATORY CHANNEL
LEYKIN, IA
POKAZEEV, KV
ROZENBERG, AD
IZVESTIYA AKADEMII NAUK SSSR FIZIKA ATMOSFERY I OKEANA, 1984, 20 (04): : 297 - 304
[30] THE OVERSHOOT EFFECT IN THE SPECTRUM OF DEVELOPING WIND-WAVES
LEIKIN, IA
POKAZEEV, KV
ROZENBERG, AD
DOKLADY AKADEMII NAUK SSSR, 1983, 270 (06): : 1474 - 1478

← 1 2 3 4 5 →