TRIZ thinking heuristics to nurture future generations of creative engineers

被引:6
作者
Belski I. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
来源
Australasian Journal of Engineering Education | 2019年 / 24卷 / 02期
关键词
creative problem-solving; Engineering creativity; engineering education; self-efficacy; TRIZ heuristic;
D O I
10.1080/22054952.2019.1699493
中图分类号
G4 [教育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0401 ;
摘要
A recent report by the Foundation for Young Australians that derived from an analysis of 4.2 million job advertisements in Australia from 2012 to 2015, revealed that the demand for professionals possessing creative problem-solving skills grew by 249%. This paper reflects on the successes of engineering educators in developing creative graduates and discusses the means to instil the skills of creative problem-solving. It considers research evidence of the suitability of heuristics (methods) for problem framing and idea generation that are sourced from the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) for enhancing the creative problem-solving skills of engineering students. Twelve TRIZ heuristics are considered. A repository of TRIZ educatinal materials (TRIZ Repository) is introduced. The outcomes of four studies from Australia, Hong Kong and New Zealand that embedded educational materials offered by the TRIZ Repository into existing courses are presented. This paper concludes that TRIZ heuristics are suitable for embedding into courses that require students to tackle open-ended problems. As demonstrated by the studies, even one class devoted to a TRIZ heuristic can statistically significantly enhance students’ creative problem-solving self-efficacy. The TRIZ Repository of educational materials may enable many engineering educators to instil creative problem-solving into their courses. © 2019, © 2019 Engineers Australia.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 97
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] An D., Runco M.A., General and Domain-Specific Contributions to Creative Ideation and Creative Performance, Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12, 4, pp. 523-532, (2016)
  • [2] Baer J., The Importance of Domain-Specific Expertise in Creativity, Roeper Review, 37, 3, (2015)
  • [3] Bandura A., Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change, Psychological Review, 84, 2, pp. 191-215, (1977)
  • [4] Barak M., Impacts of Learning Inventive Problem-Solving Principles: Students’ Transition from Systematic Searching to Heuristic problem solving, Instructional Science, 41, 4, pp. 657-679, (2013)
  • [5] Barbot B., Besancon M., Lubart T., The Generality-specificity of Creativity: Exploring the Structure of Creative Potential with EPoC, Learning and Individual Differences, 52, pp. 178-187, (2016)
  • [6] Becattini N., Borgianni Y., Cascini G., Rotini F., A TRIZ-based CAI Framework to Guide Engineering Students Towards A Broad-spectrum Investigation of Inventive Technical Problems, International Journal of Engineering Education, 29, 2, pp. 318-333, (2013)
  • [7] Becattini N., Cascini G., Improving Self-Efficacy in Solving Inventive Problems with TRIZ, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Science of Creative Thinking (MIC 2013), (2013)
  • [8] Belski A., Belski I., Teng T.C., Kwok R., Application of Substance-Field Analysis for Failure Analysis, Proceedings of the 13th ETRIA world TRIZ future conference 2013, pp. 483-490, (2013)
  • [9] Belski I., Improve Your Thinking: Substance-Field Analysis, (2007)
  • [10] Belski I., TRIZ Education: Victories, Defeats and Challenges, (Educational Technologies), 2, pp. 83-92, (2015)