Supply chain value co-creation and flexibility management decisions taking supply risk into account

被引:0
作者
Yang M. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Management, Guizhou University of Commerce, Guiyan
关键词
Supply chain flexibility; Supply chain risk; Value creation;
D O I
10.1504/IJADS.2022.121554
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Value co-creation provides an effective way to prevent and control risks in supply chain enterprises. By building a three-stage supply chain game decision model under risk conditions, rational derivation is made on the dynamic relationship between supply chain flexibility management costs, flexible benefits, unit product costs, and supply chain value creation to investigate conditions required to achieve supply chain value co-creation and optimal flexibility management. Some useful conclusions were finding that the functional relationship between flexibility management cost and supply chain value co-creation is represented as the envelope curve of optimal supply chain value creation and supply chain risks, flexible benefit, and unit product cost exert a significant impact on supply chain flexibility management effect. This article proposes that under certain supply chain risks, companies should maximise the marginal benefits of supply chain flexibility management inputs, so that supply chain flexibility management inputs show positive benefits rather than cost effects. Copyright © 2022 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 243
页数:22
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Abdel-Basset M., Mohamed R., A novel plithogenic TOPSIS-CRITIC model for sustainable supply chain risk management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, (2020)
[2]  
Alam M.S.A., Wang D., Waheed A., Khan M.S., Farrukh M., Analysing the impact of agile supply chain on firms’ sales performance with moderating effect of technological-integration, International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 12, 4, pp. 402-423, (2019)
[3]  
Bag S., Gupta S., Foropon C., Examining the role of dynamic remanufacturing capability on supply chain resilience in circular economy, Management Decision, 57, 4, pp. 863-885, (2019)
[4]  
Biedermann L., Kotzab H., Pettit T.J., Theory landscape and research perspectives in current supply chain resilience research, Lecture Notes in Logistics, pp. 26-33, (2018)
[5]  
Cardoso S.R., Barbosa-Povoa A.P., Relvas S., Novais A.Q., Evaluating supply chain resilience under different types of disruption, Computational Management Science. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 682, (2016)
[6]  
Chang W., Ellinger A.E., Evaluating supply chain risk mitigation strategy, Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science, pp. 594-595, (2015)
[7]  
Christopher M., Peck H., Building the resilient supply chain, International Journal of Logistics Management, 15, 2, pp. 1-14, (2004)
[8]  
Friemann F., Schonsleben P., Reducing global supply chain risk exposure of pharmaceutical companies by further incorporating warehouse capacity planning into the strategic supply chain planning process, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 11, 2, pp. 162-176, (2016)
[9]  
Govindan K., Mina H., Esmaeili A., Zanjani S.M.G., An integrated hybrid approach for circular supplier selection and closed loop supply chain network design under uncertainty, Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, (2020)
[10]  
Ivanov D., Structural Dynamics and Resilience in Supply Chain Risk Management, 265, (2018)