A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW OF BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE FRAMEWORK FOR TOURISM ORGANIZATIONS: FUNCTIONS AND ISSUES

被引:2
作者
Ibrahim N. [1 ]
Handayani P.W. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Indonesia, Depok
来源
Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management | 2022年 / 17卷
关键词
business intelligence; framework; functionalities; literature review; tourism;
D O I
10.28945/5025
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Aim/Purpose The main goal of this systematic literature review was to look for studies that provide information relevant to business intelligence’s (BI) framework development and implementation in the tourism sector. This paper tries to classify the tourism sectors where BI is implemented, group various BI functionalities, and identify common problems encountered by previous research. Background There has been an increased need for BI implementation to support decision-making in the tourism sector. Tourism stakeholders such as management of destination, accommodation, transportation, and public administration need a guideline to understand functional requirements before implementation. This paper addresses the problem by comprehensively reviewing the functionalities and issues that need to be considered based on previous business intelligence framework development and implementation in tourism sectors. Methodology We have conducted a systematic literature review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Guidelines for Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) method. The search is conducted using online academic database platforms, resulting in 543 initial articles published from 2002 to 2022. Contribution The paper could be of interest to relevant stakeholders in the tourism industry because it provides an overview of the capabilities and limitations of business intelligence for tourism. To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify and classify the BI functionalities needed for tourism sectors and implementation issues related to organizations, people, and technologies that need to be considered. Findings BI functionalities identified in this study include basic functions such as data analysis, reports, dashboards, data visualization, performance metrics, and key performance indicator, and advanced functions such as predictive analytics, trend indicators, strategic planning tools, profitability analysis, benchmarking, budgeting, and forecasting. When implementing BI, the issues that need to be considered include organizational, people and process, and technological issues. Recommendations As data is a major issue in BI implementation, tourism stakeholders, especially for Practitioners in developing countries, may need to build a tourism data center or centralized coordination regulated by the government. They can implement basic functions first before implementing more advanced features later. Recommendations We recommend further studying the BI implementation barriers by employing a for Researchers perspective of an adoption framework such as the technology, organization, and environment (TOE) framework. Impact on Society This research has a potential impact on improving the tourism industry’s performance by providing insight to stakeholders about what is needed to help them make more accurate decisions using business intelligence. Future Research Future research may involve collaboration between practitioners and academics in developing various BI architectures specific to each tourism industry, such as destination management, hospitality, or transportation. © 2022 Informing Science Institute. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 541
页数:18
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Badawy M., Abd El-Aziz A. A., Idress A. M., Hefny H., Hossam S., A survey on exploring key performance indicators, Future Computing and Informatics Journal, 1, 1–2, pp. 47-52, (2016)
  • [2] Buhalis D., Foerste M., SoCoMo marketing for travel and tourism: Empowering co-creation of value, Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 4, 3, pp. 151-161, (2015)
  • [3] Buhalis D., Leung R., Smart hospitality – Interconnectivity and interoperability towards an ecosystem, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 71, pp. 41-50, (2018)
  • [4] Del Vecchio P., Secundo G., Passiante G., Analyzing big data through the lens of customer knowledge management: Evidence from a set of regional tourism experiences, Kybernetes, 47, 7, pp. 1348-1362, (2018)
  • [5] Fuchs M., Abadzhiev A., Svensson B., Hopken W., Lexhagen M., A knowledge destination framework for tourism sustainability: A business intelligence application from Sweden, Tourism: An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 61, 2, pp. 121-148, (2013)
  • [6] Hamilton J. R., Selen W., A multi-agent business intelligence framework for the travel sector, Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB), pp. 36-42, (2008)
  • [7] Hlee S., Yhee Y., Chung N., Koo C., Service innovation by design thinking methods: A case of Seoul children’s grand park (SCGP), E-Review of Tourism Research, 17, 2, pp. 271-291, (2019)
  • [8] Ivanov S. H., Hotel revenue management: From theory to practice, (2014)
  • [9] Jimenez-Marquez J. L., Gonzalez-Carrasco I., Lopez-Cuadrado J. L., Ruiz-Mezcua B., Towards a big data framework for analyzing social media content, International Journal of Information Management, 44, pp. 1-12, (2019)
  • [10] Liberati A., Altman D. G., Tetzlaff J., Mulrow C., Gotzsche P. C., Ioannidis J. P. A., Clarke M., Devereaux P. J., Kleijnen J., Moher D., The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration, Journal of Cinical Epidemiology, 62, 10, pp. e1-e34, (2009)