Motion characteristics and drag coefficient of bubbles in liquid lead-bismuth eutectic

被引:0
|
作者
Luo H. [1 ]
Liu L. [1 ]
Yuan J. [1 ]
Bao R. [1 ]
Tian X. [2 ]
Li D. [2 ]
Gu H. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai
[2] Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi'an
来源
He Jishu/Nuclear Techniques | 2024年 / 47卷 / 06期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 上海市自然科学基金;
关键词
Bubble dynamics; Bubble – liquid metal two-phase flow; Drag coefficient; Lead-bismuth cooled fast reactor; SGTR accident;
D O I
10.11889/j.0253-3219.2024.hjs.47.060603
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
[Background] Steam generator tube rupture (SGTR) accidents in lead-bismuth cooled fast reactors result in the generation of numerous steam bubbles owing to the interaction of the high-temperature liquid lead-bismuth eutectic (LBE) from the primary circuit and high-pressure subcooled water of the secondary circuit. These steam bubbles carried by the LBE may enter the core, causing local heat transfer deterioration and a power transient, seriously affecting reactor safety. [Purpose] This study aims to elucidate the movement and dynamic behaviors of steam bubbles in liquid LBE and develop a drag coefficient model applicable to bubble migration in LBE for assessing the safety of the core during SGTR accidents. [Methods] Based on the coupled level-set and volume-of-fluid (CLSVOF) method, a three-dimensional numerical model for calculating the drag coefficient of steam bubbles in LBE was established to study their movement and dynamic behaviors. Firstly, the deformation, velocity, and trajectory characteristics of bubbles in LBE were analyzed, and their drag coefficients were estimated. Then, the simulated drag coefficient values were compared with those from existing models whilst the prediction performance of the model proposed by Tomiyama was superior to those of the others. Finally, Tomiyama's drag model was optimized by introducing the We number, and its applicability was analyzed. [Results] Analysis results show that the errors of the existing drag coefficient models are large under the condition of bubble–LBE two-phase flow, and the calculation error of the optimized model for the bubble drag coefficient in LBE is within 15%. [Conclusions] The feasibility of drag calculation model optimized in this study is verified, demonstrating its suitability for calculating the drag coefficient of steam bubbles in LBE. © 2024 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Hoseyni S M, Karimi K, Hoseyni S M, Et al., Success criteria analysis in support of probabilistic risk assessment for nuclear power plants: application on SGTR accident, Nuclear Science and Techniques, 28, 3, (2017)
  • [2] Borreani W, Bruzzone M, Chersola D, Et al., Preliminary thermal-fluid-dynamic assessment of an ADS irradiation facility for fast and slow neutrons[J], International Journal of Heat and Technology, 35, Special Issue1, pp. S186-S190, (2017)
  • [3] Bortot S, Artioli C., Investigation of the void reactivity effect in large-size Lead Fast Reactors[J], Annals of Nuclear Energy, 38, 5, pp. 1004-1013, (2011)
  • [4] Andreeva M, Groudev P, Pavlova M., Analytical validation of operator actions in case of primary to secondary leakage for VVER-1000/V320[J], Nuclear Engineering and Design, 295, pp. 479-488, (2015)
  • [5] Dong H F, Wang X L, Liu L, Et al., The rise and deformation of a single bubble in ionic liquids[J], Chemical Engineering Science, 65, 10, pp. 3240-3248, (2010)
  • [6] Ishii M, Chawla T C., Local drag laws in dispersed two-phase flow[J], Multiphase Flow Dynamics, 80, (1980)
  • [7] Peebles F, Garber H., Studies on the motion of gas bubbles in liquids[J], Chemical Engineering Progress, 49, 2, (1953)
  • [8] Mei R W, Klausner J F., Unsteady force on a spherical bubble at finite Reynolds number with small fluctuations in the free-stream velocity[J], Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 4, 1, pp. 63-70, (1992)
  • [9] Tomiyama A, Kataoka I, Zun I, Et al., Drag coefficients of single bubbles under normal and micro gravity conditions [J], JSME International Journal Series B, 41, 2, pp. 472-479, (1998)
  • [10] Zhou Y J, Zhao C R, Bo H., Analyses and modified models for bubble shape and drag coefficient covering a wide range of working conditions, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 127, (2020)