Information vs. Automation and Implications for Dynamic Pricing

被引:28
作者
Bollinger, Bryan K. [1 ]
Hartmann, Wesley R. [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Stern Sch Business, New York, NY 10012 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
automation technology; demand response; short-run elasticities; utilities; energy; electricity; field experiments; ELECTRICITY; EFFICIENCY; SEARCH; IMPACT; COSTS; BRAND;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2018.3225
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Essential resources, like electricity and water, can experience rapidly changing demand or supply while the other side of the market is unchanged. Short-run price variation could efficiently allocate resources at these critical times but only if consumers exhibit short-run demand elasticity. The question for firms in these markets has always been how to enable this response. Randomized control trials are increasingly used to test dynamic pricing and technologies that can assist in response by providing information and/or automated response. However, the trials typically do not randomize short-run prices. This paper illustrates how demand from a randomly assigned control group can be used to test the effectiveness of different technologies in increasing short-term price elasticity. To do so, we use a nonparametric control function approach that eliminates the bias inherent in estimating short-term price response using only household random assignment. We find that only automation technology leads to the short-term price elasticity needed to justify real-time pricing.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 314
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Market Implications and Pricing of Dynamic Reserve Policies for Systems With Renewables [J].
Lyon, Joshua D. ;
Wang, Fengyu ;
Hedman, Kory W. ;
Zhang, Muhong .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2015, 30 (03) :1593-1602
[22]   Dynamic Pricing and Mean Field Analysis for Controlling Age of Information [J].
Wang, Xuehe ;
Duan, Lingjie .
IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 2022, 30 (06) :2588-2600
[23]   Pricing of European currency options considering the dynamic information costs [J].
Dammak, Wael ;
Ben Hamad, Salah ;
de Peretti, Christian ;
Eleuch, Hichem .
GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2023, 58
[24]   Information acquisition in auctions: Sealed bids vs. open bids [J].
Hernando-Veciana, Angel .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2009, 65 (02) :372-405
[25]   Contracting under adverse selection: Certifiable vs. uncertifiable information [J].
Schmitz, Patrick W. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2021, 182 :100-112
[26]   Is market impact a measure of the information value of trades? Market response to liquidity vs. informed metaorders [J].
Gomes, C. ;
Waelbroeck, H. .
QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2015, 15 (05) :773-793
[27]   Shopping for Information: Implications of Consumer Learning for Optimal Pricing and Product Design [J].
Pease, Marilyn .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 71 (03) :883-923
[28]   Dynamic pricing of electricity for residential customers: the evidence from Michigan [J].
Ahmad Faruqui ;
Sanem Sergici ;
Lamine Akaba .
Energy Efficiency, 2013, 6 :571-584
[29]   Dynamic pricing of electricity for residential customers: the evidence from Michigan [J].
Faruqui, Ahmad ;
Sergici, Sanem ;
Akaba, Lamine .
ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2013, 6 (03) :571-584
[30]   European vs. US airlines: Performance comparison in a dynamic market [J].
Assaf, A. George ;
Josiassen, Alexander .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2012, 33 (02) :317-326