Harmonic emission level estimation method based on an improved bald eagle search optimized extreme learning machine

被引:0
作者
Xia Y. [1 ]
Zhu Z. [1 ]
Tang W. [1 ]
Ren J. [1 ]
Zhang Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Electrical Engineering and Electronic Information, Xihua University, Chengdu
来源
Dianli Xitong Baohu yu Kongzhi/Power System Protection and Control | 2024年 / 52卷 / 01期
关键词
bald eagle search optimization; Cauchy variant operator; extreme learning machine; harmonic emission level; Tent chaotic mapping;
D O I
10.19783/j.cnki.pspc.230593
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A harmonic emission level estimation method based on an improved bald eagle search (IBES) optimized extreme learning machine (ELM) is proposed to address the problem that it is difficult to measure that level directly. First, the Tent chaotic mapping and the Cauchy variant operator are introduced into the traditional bald eagle search algorithm, and the input weights and thresholds of the ELM model are optimized using the IBES algorithm. Second, the harmonic voltage and current at the point of common coupling (PCC) are input and substituted into the IBES-ELM model to estimate the customer-side and system-side harmonic emission levels. Finally, simulations and engineering examples are analyzed and the estimation results are compared with those of other algorithms. The results show that the estimation accuracy of the proposed IBES-ELM method is better than that of long short-term memory (LSTM), convolution neural network (CNN), the back propagation neural network (BP) and CNN-LSTM algorithm models. This verifies the effectiveness and stability of the method. © 2024 Power System Protection and Control Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 165
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
BO Zhiqian, LIN Xiangning, WANG Qingping, Et al., Developments of power system protection and control, Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, 1, 1, pp. 1-8, (2016)
[2]  
DING Tong, CHEN Hongkun, WU Bin, Et al., Overview on location and harmonic responsibility quantitative determination methods of multiple harmonic sources, Electric Power Automation Equipment, 40, 1, pp. 19-30, (2020)
[3]  
XU W, LIU Y., A method for determining customer and utility harmonic contributions at the point of common coupling, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 15, 2, pp. 804-811, (2000)
[4]  
LIU Ziteng, XU Yonghai, TAO Shun, Research status and prospect of harmonic responsibility quantitative evaluation method under grid-connection of new energy, Electric Power Automation Equipment, 40, 11, pp. 203-213, (2020)
[5]  
ZHAO Yongyang, XU Fangwei, SHU Qin, Et al., Harmonic impedance estimation on system side based on minimum fluctuation energy of background harmonic, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 43, 24, pp. 142-148, (2019)
[6]  
WANG Hangya, XIAO Xianyong, WU Jun, Et al., Utility harmonic impedance estimation based on binary linear regression with linearity calibration, Proceedings of the CSEE, 40, 9, pp. 2826-2835, (2020)
[7]  
LI Li, MA Hongzhong, JIANG Ning, Et al., Assessing harmonic impedance and the harmonic emission level based on improved partial least-squares regression method, Power System Protection and Control, 39, 1, pp. 92-95, (2011)
[8]  
HUI Jin, YANG Honggeng, LIN Shunfu, Et al., Assessment method of harmonic emission level based on covariance characteristic of random vectors, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 33, 7, pp. 27-31, (2009)
[9]  
SHU Q, WU Y, XU F, Et al., Estimate Utility harmonic impedance via the correlation of harmonic measurements in different time intervals, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 35, 4, pp. 2060-2067, (2020)
[10]  
CHEN F, MAO N, WANG Y, Et al., Improved utility harmonic impedance measurement based on robust independent component analysis and bootstrap check, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 14, 5, pp. 910-919, (2020)