Shifted log loss Gaussian process model for expected quality loss prediction in robust parameter design

被引:3
作者
Jiang F. [1 ]
Tan M.H.-Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong
关键词
computer experiments; loss function; noise factors; Robust design; shifted log transform;
D O I
10.1080/16843703.2021.1910190
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Robust parameter design (RPD) aims at reducing the effect of noise variation on quality through achieving a small expected quality loss (EQL). In RPD with time-consuming computer simulations, Gaussian process (GP) models are used to predict the EQL. Three straightforward models for predicting the EQL include a GP model for the simulator output, a GP model for the quality loss, and a lognormal process model for the quality loss (the log quality loss is modeled as a GP). Each of these models has some drawbacks as discussed in this paper. We propose the shifted log loss GP model, which includes the lognormal process model for the quality loss and the GP model for the quality loss as special cases when the shift varies from zero to infinity. The proposed model overcomes some of the limitations of the three existing models. It has a simple and accurate approximation for the posterior EQL distribution, and it gives accurate and precise predictions of the EQL. We illustrate the superior performance of the proposed model over the three existing models with a toy example and an RPD problem involving a steel beam. © 2021 International Chinese Association of Quantitative Management.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 551
页数:24
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Abu-Dayya A.A., Beaulieu N.C., Outage probabilities in the presence of correlated lognormal interferers, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 43, 1, pp. 164-173, (1994)
[2]  
Apley D.W., Liu J., Chen W., Understanding the effects of model uncertainty in robust design with computer experiments, Journal of Mechanical Design, 128, 4, pp. 945-958, (2006)
[3]  
Atkinson A.C., Diagnostic regression analysis and shifted power transformations, Technometrics, 25, 1, pp. 23-33, (1983)
[4]  
Atkinson A.C., Pericchi L.R., Smith R.L., Grouped likelihood for the shifted power transformation, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 53, 2, pp. 473-482, (1991)
[5]  
Bates R.A., Kenett R.S., Steinberg D.M., Wynn H.P., Achieving robust design from computer simulations, Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 3, 2, pp. 161-177, (2006)
[6]  
Bates R.A., Wynn H.P., Tolerancing and optimization for model-based robust engineering design, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 12, 2, pp. 119-127, (1996)
[7]  
Buck R.J., Wynn H.P., Optimization strategies in robust engineering design and computer‐aided design, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 9, 1, pp. 39-48, (1993)
[8]  
Chang P.B., Williams B.J., Bhalla K.S.B., Belknap T.W., Santner T.J., Notz W.I., Bartel D.L., Design and analysis of robust total joint replacements: Finite element model experiments with environmental variables, J. Biomech. Eng, 123, 3, pp. 239-246, (2001)
[9]  
Chen S., Chen W., Lee S., Level set based robust shape and topology optimization under random field uncertainties, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 41, 4, pp. 507-524, (2010)
[10]  
Chen W., Jin R., Sudjianto A., Analytical global sensitivity analysis and uncertainty propagation for robust design, Journal of Quality Technology, 38, 4, pp. 333-348, (2006)