Cause and consequence of occasional computational delay in real-time hybrid simulation

被引:0
|
作者
Huang L. [1 ,2 ]
Huang S. [1 ,2 ]
Wang J. [1 ,2 ]
Xu W. [3 ]
Guo T. [3 ]
机构
[1] College of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei
[2] Anhui Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Structures and Materials, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei
[3] Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing
关键词
Actuator delay; Computational delay; Prediction and correct; Real-time hybrid simulation; Sub-step technology;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2021.01.011
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To investigate the cause and consequence of computational delay in the experiments, the calculation time of sliding isolator tests was analyzed and the real-time performance was evaluated. The results show that the computational delay occasionally appears at some integration steps, thus destroying the real-time performance of the tests. The computational delay is caused by the slow convergence speed of errors in iterative calculations by introducing the implicit integration algorithm into the tests. The computational delay has contingency and randomness, affecting the load rate of the test specimen and making the command displacement signal present S-shaped curves. The signal commands the actuator to switch from deceleration to acceleration in a short time interval, so that the actuator needs to overcome the huge inertial force, resulting in an obvious actuator response delay. By using the explicit integration algorithm and simplifying the numerical model, the calculation time of real-time hybrid simulation can be greatly reduced, thus avoiding the computational delay and ensuring the real-time performance of the tests. © 2021, Editorial Department of Journal of Southeast University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 86
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Ahmadizadeh M, Mosqueda G, Reinhorn A M., Compensation of actuator delay and dynamics for real-time hybrid structural simulation, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 37, 1, pp. 21-42, (2008)
  • [2] Nakashima M, Kato H, Takaoka E., Development of real-time pseudo dynamic testing, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 21, 1, pp. 79-92, (1992)
  • [3] Nakashima M., Hybrid simulation: An early history, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 49, 10, pp. 949-962, (2020)
  • [4] Carrion J E, Spencer B F, Model-based strategies for real-time hybrid testing
  • [5] Huang L, Chen C, Guo T, Et al., Stability analysis of real-time hybrid simulation for time-varying actuator delay using the Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional approach, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 145, 1, (2019)
  • [6] Xu W J, Guo T, Chen C., Localized evaluation of actuator tracking for real-time hybrid simulation using frequency-domain indices, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 62, 5, (2017)
  • [7] Chae Y, Kazemibidokhti K, Ricles J M., Adaptive time series compensator for delay compensation of servo-hydraulic actuator systems for real-time hybrid simulation, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42, 11, pp. 1697-1715, (2013)
  • [8] Chen Y S, Wu B, Wang Z, Et al., Simulation and validation of hybrid testing system based on simulink, Journal of Vibration and Shock, 33, 7, pp. 18-23, (2014)
  • [9] Wu B, Bao H, Ou J, Et al., Stability and accuracy analysis of the central difference method for real-time substructure testing, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 34, 7, pp. 705-718, (2005)
  • [10] Newmark N M., A method of computation for structural dynamics, Journal of Engineering Mechanics-ASCE, 85, 3, pp. 67-94, (1959)