Emission Control Strategies of Atmospheric Heavy Metals for Coal-fired Power Plants

被引:0
|
作者
Gu Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] GD Power Development Co., Ltd., Chaoyang District, Beijing
关键词
coal-fired power plants; decision tree; emission control strategies; heavy metals; ultra-low emission;
D O I
10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.221649
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Coal combustion is the most important source of anthropogenic atmospheric releases of heavy metals. To develop the economical and efficient emission control strategies of atmospheric heavy metals suitable for coal-fired power plants in China, this paper systematically analyzes the main characteristics of 6 concerning heavy metals (Hg, As, Pb, Se, Cd and Cr) in Chinese coal in relation to their content, distribution, and emission control measure. Particularly, the best available technique (BAT) and best environment practice (BEP) decision tree models for each technological option of heavy metals emission control are established, and the emission reduction effects for different BAT/BEP control strategies are evaluated. The results show that the atmospheric heavy metals emissions from coal-fired power plants are significantly correlated with coal property, boiler type, and air pollution control devices (APCDs). For the ultra-low or near-zero emission units equipped with selective catalytic reduction (SCR) + eletrostatic precipitator (ESP) + wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) (+WESP), the modified fly ash specialized mercury removal technology and enhancement of synergistic control technologies exhibit significant effects on the deep removal of atmospheric Hg and other 5 heavy metals (As, Pb, Se, Cd and Cr), respectively. ©2023 Chin.Soc.for Elec.Eng.
引用
收藏
页码:5955 / 5969
页数:14
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [71] GLESMANN S, MIMNA R., The state of U.S. mercury control in response to MATS
  • [72] JONES A P, HOFFMANN J W, SMITH D N, DOE/NETL’s phase II mercury control technology field testing program : preliminary economic analysis of activated carbon injection[J], Environmental Science & Technology, 41, 4, pp. 1365-1371, (2007)
  • [73] ZHANG Yongsheng, MEI Dongqian, WANG Tao, In-situ capture of mercury in coal-fired power plants using high surface energy fly ash[J], Environmental Science & Technology, 53, 13, pp. 7913-7920, (2019)
  • [74] WANG Shumin, ZHANG Yongsheng, Yongzheng GU, Coupling of bromide and on-line mechanical modified fly ash for mercury removal at a 1000 MW coal-fired power plant[J], Fuel, 247, pp. 179-186, (2019)
  • [75] ANCORA M P,, ZHANG Lei, WANG Shuxiao, Meeting Minamata:cost-effective compliance options for atmospheric mercury control in Chinese coal-fired power plants[J], Energy Policy, 88, pp. 485-494, (2016)
  • [76] XU Jingying, SI Junping, LIU Xiaowei, PM<sub>2.5</sub> reduction in furnace during coal combustion[J], Thermal Power Generation, 42, 8, pp. 1-12, (2013)
  • [77] GUO Yiquan, ZHAO Yongchun, LI Gaolei, Research on emission characteristics of chemical agglomeration of fly ash fine particles from a 300MW coal-fired power plant boiler[J], Proceedings of the CSEE, 39, 3, pp. 754-763, (2019)
  • [78] HE Mingchun, Study on the agglomeration and removal of fine particles in multiple fields, (2020)
  • [79] ZHANG Yue, WANG Chunbo, LI Wenhan, Removal of gas-phase As<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> by metal oxide adsorbents:effects of experimental conditions and evaluation of adsorption mechanism[J], Energy & Fuels, 29, 10, pp. 6578-6585, (2015)
  • [80] GUO Shengli, LI Dongwei, GENG Weile, Controlling effect of the modified calcium carbonate on the capture of As,Cd and Zn during coal combustion[J], Journal of China Coal Society, 40, 12, pp. 2967-2973, (2015)