A Chaotic Multi-Objective Runge-Kutta Optimization Algorithm for Optimized Circuit Design

被引:0
作者
Nyandieka O.M. [1 ]
Segera D.R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Nairobi, Nairobi
关键词
Compendex;
D O I
10.1155/2023/6691214
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Circuit design plays a pivotal role in engineering, ensuring the creation of efficient, reliable, and cost-effective electronic devices. The complexity of modern circuit design problems has led to the exploration of multi-objective optimization techniques for circuit design optimization, as traditional optimization tools fall short in handling such problems. While metaheuristic algorithms, especially genetic algorithms, have demonstrated promise, their susceptibility to premature convergence poses challenges. This paper proposes a pioneering approach, the chaotic multi-objective Runge-Kutta algorithm (CMRUN), for circuit design optimization, building upon the Runge-Kutta optimization algorithm. By infusing chaos into the core RUN structure, a refined balance between exploration and exploitation is obtained, critical for addressing complex optimization landscapes, enabling the algorithm to navigate nonlinear and nonconvex optimization challenges effectively. This approach is extended to accommodate multiple objectives, ultimately generating Pareto Fronts for the multiple circuit design goals. The performance of CMRUN is rigorously evaluated against 11 multiobjective algorithms, encompassing 15 benchmark test functions and practical circuit design scenarios. The findings of this study underscore the efficiency and real-world applicability of CMRUN, offering valuable insights for tailoring optimization algorithms to the real-world circuit design challenges. © 2023 Owen M. Nyandieka and Davies R. Segera.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An optimization method of mine ventilation system based on R2 index hybrid multi-objective equilibrium optimization algorithm
    Yu, Bao-cai
    Shao, Liang-shan
    Energy Reports, 2022, 8 : 11003 - 11021
  • [22] Preference-based Multi-objective Optimization Model for Life-cycle Seismic Design of Bridge
    Li, Yu-Jing
    Li, Hong-Nan
    Li, Chao
    Zhongguo Gonglu Xuebao/China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30 (12): : 187 - 195
  • [23] Research on Multi-objective Optimization of Freight Train Operation Process Based on Improved Bald Eagle Search Algorithm
    Yi, Lingzhi
    Zhang, Dake
    Li, Wang
    Duan, Renzhe
    Jiang, Peng
    Liu, Bo
    Journal of Computers (Taiwan), 2022, 33 (05) : 135 - 150
  • [24] A Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Algorithm for Multi-Objective Agricultural Site Selection and Logistics Optimization Problem
    Liu, Huan
    Zhang, Jizhe
    Zhou, Zhao
    Dai, Yongqiang
    Qin, Lijing
    Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 14 (18):
  • [25] Simulation analysis and countermeasure of multi-objective optimization scheduling in manufacturing workshops
    Liang, Qianhua
    Academic Journal of Manufacturing Engineering, 2018, 16 (04): : 140 - 146
  • [26] Improved multi-objective genetic algorithm based on parallel hybrid evolutionary theory
    Zou, Yingyong
    Zhang, Yongde
    Li, Qinghua
    Jiang, Jingang
    Yu, Guangbin
    International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology, 2015, 8 (01): : 133 - 140
  • [27] Multi-objective task scheduling in cloud computing environment by hybridized bat algorithm
    Bezdan, Timea
    Zivkovic, Miodrag
    Bacanin, Nebojsa
    Strumberger, Ivana
    Tuba, Eva
    Tuba, Milan
    Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2022, 42 (01) : 411 - 423
  • [28] Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on bipolar preferences dominance and its application
    Qiu, Fei-Yue
    Wu, Yu-Shi
    Wang, Li-Ping
    Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS, 2012, 18 (12): : 2696 - 2706
  • [29] Cable tension control of tsuneyoshi bridge using multi-objective genetic algorithm
    Furuta, Hitoshi
    Kawamura, Yukio
    Arimura, Hideki
    Takase, Kazuo
    Struct. Congr.: Adv. Technol. Struct. Eng.,
  • [30] Automated multi-objective reaction optimisation: which algorithm should I use?
    Müller, Pia
    Clayton, Adam D.
    Manson, Jamie
    Riley, Samuel
    May, Oliver S.
    Govan, Norman
    Notman, Stuart
    Ley, Steven V.
    Chamberlain, Thomas W.
    Bourne, Richard A.
    Reaction Chemistry and Engineering, 2022, 7 (04) : 987 - 993