Response of taro to varying water regimes and soil textures

被引:0
|
作者
Li M. [1 ]
Deus A.C.F. [2 ]
Ming L.C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept. of Horticulture, Agronomical Sciences College, São Paulo State Univ., José Barbosa of Barros St., 1780, Botucatu, SP
[2] Dept. of Soil and Environmental Resources, Agronomical Sciences College, São Paulo State Univ., José Barbosa of Barros St., 1780, Botucatu, SP
来源
关键词
Canopy size; Corm yield; Irrigation; Soil type; Water-use efficiency (WUE);
D O I
10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0001373
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott] is a major root crop widely distributed in the tropics and subtropics. However, little information is available on its water stress tolerance under different soil textures. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of five water regimes (20%, 60%, 100%, 140%, and 180% ETc-crop water requirement) and three soil textures (clay, sandy clay loam, and sandy soil) on the growth, yield, and water-use efficiency (WUE) of taro. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, and two harvests of taro were analyzed. In both harvests, leaf number (LN), leaf area (LA), and corm yield (Yc) were lower at 20% and 60% ETc when compared with 100% ETc, and higher at 140% ETc and 180% ETc when compared with 100% ETc. Sandy soil (SS) exhibited higher LN at all water regimes than clay soil (CS) and sandy clay loam (SCL) soil. For LA, the values found in SS were higher at lower water regimes (20% and 60% ETc). In the three types of soil, WUE was significantly higher at 20% ETc, 1.00 and 0.51 kgm-3, respectively, in the first and second harvests compared with the other water regimes. In the second harvest, WUE and Yc were significantly higher in SS compared with CS and SCL, indicating that SS has greater potential to improve the WUE of taro under limited water availability conditions. © 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Response of Taro to Varying Water Regimes and Soil Textures
    Li, Meiling
    Fernandes Deus, Angelica Cristina
    Ming, Lin Chau
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2019, 145 (03)
  • [2] Closure to "Response of Taro to Varying Water Regimes and Soil Textures" by Meiling Li, Angelica Cristina Fernandes Deus, and Lin Chau Ming
    Li, Meiling
    Fernandes Deus, Angelica Cristina
    Chau Ming, Lin
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2020, 146 (02)
  • [3] Discussion of "Response of Taro to Varying Water Regimes and Soil Textures" by Meiling Li, Angelica Cristina Fernandes Deus, and Lin Chau Ming
    Djaman, Koffi
    Koudahe, Komlan
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2020, 146 (02)
  • [4] Response of taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) landraces to varying water regimes under a rainshelter
    Mabhaudhi, T.
    Modi, A. T.
    Beletse, Y. G.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2013, 121 : 102 - 112
  • [5] Growth, yield and quality of Saffron in response to different soil textures and temperature regimes
    Khaliq, Abdul
    Sarfraz, Muhammad
    Tahir, Majid Mehmood
    Awan, Shahid Iqbal
    Zafar, Mohsin
    Shehzad, Muhammad
    Shaheen, Aqila
    Iqbal, Aamir
    SOIL & ENVIRONMENT, 2024,
  • [6] ROOT POROSITY OF PEANUT UNDER VARYING SOIL-WATER REGIMES
    KHAN, AR
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ACKER UND PFLANZENBAU-JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 1983, 152 (03): : 219 - 223
  • [7] RESPONSE OF BROCCOLI TO 5 SOIL-WATER REGIMES
    MAURER, AR
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1976, 56 (04) : 953 - 959
  • [8] Water use of selected grain legumes in response to varying irrigation regimes
    Chibarabada, Tendai P.
    Modi, Albert T.
    Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe
    WATER SA, 2019, 45 (01) : 110 - 120
  • [9] Effects of defoliation at varying soil water regimes on aboveground biomass of perennial grasses
    Flemmer, AC
    Busso, CA
    Fernández, OA
    Montani, T
    ARID LAND RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 17 (02) : 139 - 152
  • [10] Transpirational response to water availability for winter wheat as affected by soil textures
    Wu, Yuanzhi
    Huang, Mingbin
    Gallichand, Jacques
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2011, 98 (04) : 569 - 576