A comparative study for biomass gasification in bubbling bed gasifier using Aspen HYSYS

被引：26

作者：

Kartal F. ^{[1
]}

Özveren U. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Chemical Engineering, Marmara University, Goztepe Campus, Kadikoy, 34722, Istanbul

来源：

Bioresource Technology Reports | 2021年 / 13卷

关键词：

Aspen HYSYS; Biomass; Bubbling bed gasifier; Gasification; Thermodynamic analysis;

D O I：

10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100615

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This study presents bubbling bed gasification characteristics of the agricultural and livestock wastes performing sensitivity analysis in the Aspen HYSYS process simulator. Effects of operating conditions on syngas composition, syngas exergy, and syngas lower heating value were examined. Sensitivity analysis results indicated the optimum steam/biomass ratio (0.2–0.3) and gasifier temperature (700 °C–800 °C) to produce syngas with the highest quality. The novelty of the work can be divided into two parts: initially, it is a comparative study for gasification of agricultural and livestock wastes in bubbling bed gasifier and secondly, although fluidized gasifiers have been modeled and comparative studies have been conducted with Aspen Plus® before, there are no similar analyses for bubbling bed gasifiers for agricultural and livestock wastes in Aspen HYSYS, according to our best knowledge. The deductions of this study are significant in terms of development of bubbling bed gasifiers for biomass. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd

引用

共 50 条

[21]

Lan W., Chen G., Zhu X., Wang X., Liu C., Xu B., Biomass gasification-gas turbine combustion for power generation system model based on ASPEN PLUS, Sci. Tot. Environ., 628, pp. 1278-1286, (2018)

[22]

Marmolejo-Correa D., Gundersen T., A new efficiency parameter for exergy analysis in low temperature processes, Int. J. Exergy., 17, 2, pp. 135-170, (2015)

[23]

Melikoglu M., Vision 2023: forecasting Turkey's natural gas demand between 2013 and 2030, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 22, pp. 393-400, (2013)

[24]

Melikoglu M., Vision 2023: status quo and future of biomass and coal for sustainable energy generation in Turkey, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 74, pp. 800-808, (2017)

[25]

Melikoglu M., Albostan A., Bioethanol production and potential of Turkey, J. Eng. Arch. Gazi Unv., 26, 1, pp. 151-160, (2011)

[26]

Milani R., Szklo A., Hoffmann B.S., Hybridization of concentrated solar power with biomass gasification in Brazil's semiarid region, Energ. Conv. Manag., 143, pp. 522-537, (2017)

[27]

Monteiro E., Ismail T.M., Ramos A., Abd El-Salam M., Brito P., Rouboa A., Assessment of the miscanthus gasification in a semi-industrial gasifier using a CFD model, Appl. Therm. Eng., 123, pp. 448-457, (2017)

[28]

Motta I.L., Miranda N.T., Maciel Filho R., Maciel M.R.W., Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: a review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 94, pp. 998-1023, (2018)

[29]

Nikoo M.B., Mahinpey N., Simulation of biomass gasification in fluidized bed reactor using ASPEN PLUS, Bio. and Bioenerg., 32, 12, pp. 1245-1254, (2008)

[30]

Nipattummakul N., Ahmed I., Kerdsuwan S., Gupta A.K., High temperature steam gasification of wastewater sludge, Appl. Energ., 87, 12, pp. 3729-3734, (2010)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →