Literature review on ethical decision making in organizations

被引：0
作者：
Díez-Gómez D.A. [1 ]
Guillén M. [2 ]
Rodríguez M.D.P. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Manizales, Campus La Nubia, Grupo de Investigación Ethos – Bloque Q, Manizales
[2] Universidad de Valencia, Facultad de Economía, Dpto. de Dirección de Empresas, Valencia
[3] Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Manizales, Campus La Nubia, Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Dpto. de Ingeniería Industrial, Manizales
来源：
Informacion Tecnologica | 2019年 / 30卷 / 03期
关键词：
Complex integral realism; Ethical decision making; Ethics; Organizational ethics; Transdisciplinary; Tree of Science (ToS);
D O I：
10.4067/S0718-07642019000300025
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
This paper reviews the literature on ethical decision making in organizations, to establish its levels of disciplinary integration, as well as its more notorious theoretical and methodological approaches. To that end, systematic and narrative analysis were combined. The systematic review was based on references obtained from the Web of Science (WoS), which were analyzed through the Tree of Science (ToS) platform to identify citation networks. The narrative review was based on the analysis of complementary references through Gephi. The literature was classified into three levels of disciplinary dialogue: 1) Conceptual importation; 2) Theoretical reciprocity; and 3) Theoretical unity. It is concluded that the lack of studies grounded in theoretical unity, integrated and mixed approaches, justifies the development of studies based on a more transdisciplinary vision of decision-making theory and practice. Hence, it is proposed to resort to complex integral realism, as a promising route to develop the required transdisciplinary vision of Ethical Decision Making. © 2019 Centro de Informacion Tecnologica. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：25 / 38
页数：13
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Ananthram S., Chan C., Religiosity, spirituality and ethical decision-making: Perspectives from executives in Indian multinational enterprises, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33, 3, pp. 843-880, (2016)
  • [2] Bachmann C., Habisch A., Dierksmeier C., Practical wisdom: Management’s no longer forgotten virtue, Journal of Business Ethics, First Online, (2017)
  • [3] Bachmann C., Sasse L., Habisch A., Applying the practical wisdom lenses in decision-making: An integrative approach to humanistic management, Humanistic Management Journal, 2, 2, pp. 125-150, (2018)
  • [4] Beekun R.I., Stedham Y., Westerman J.W., Yamamura J.H., Effects of justice and utilitarianism on ethical decision making: A crosscultural examination of gender similarities and differences, Business Ethics: A European Review, 19, 4, pp. 309-325, (2010)
  • [5] Berger J.T., DeRenzo E.G., Schwartz J., Surrogate decision making: Reconciling ethical theory and clinical practice, Annals of Internal Medicine, 149, pp. 25-48, (2008)
  • [6] Bhaskar R., Hartwig M., The Formation of Critical Realism, (2010)
  • [7] Boda Z., Zsolnai L., The failure of business ethics, Society and Business Review, 11, 1, pp. 93-104, (2016)
  • [8] Calderon G., Aprender A Investigar Investigando, (2005)
  • [9] Campbell D., Cowton C., Method issues in business ethics research: Finding credible answers to questions that matter, Business Ethics: A European Review, 24, 1, pp. 3-10, (2015)
  • [10] Carvajal Y., Interdisciplinariedad: Desafío para la Educación Superior y la Investigación, Revista Luna Azul, 31, 31, pp. 156-169, (2010)
1234567