Trajectory planning method based on Newton iteration, convex optimization and active thrust adjustment

被引:0
作者
Zhang L. [1 ]
Zhao K. [1 ]
Zhang Z. [2 ]
Kuang D. [2 ]
Li Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen
[2] Shanghai Aerospace System Engineering Research Institute, Shanghai
[3] Hangzhou Center, China Academy of Space Technology, Hangzhou
来源
Zhongguo Guanxing Jishu Xuebao/Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology | 2023年 / 31卷 / 12期
关键词
convex optimization; launch vehicle; Newton iteration; thrust adjustment;
D O I
10.13695/j.cnki.12-1222/o3.2023.12.008
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To solve the problem of inability to satisfy quantitative aerodynamic bending-moment constraints in launch vehicle trajectory planning. A trajectory planning method that combines Newton iteration, convex optimization, and active thrust adjustment is proposed. Firstly, a four-dimensional Newton iteration method is employed to design a standard trajectory, disregarding wind and process constraints. Then, considering the maximum aerodynamic bending-moment of the ascent phase and wind influence, one-dimensional Newton method is applied to obtain the thrust coefficient, ensuring the aerodynamic bending-moment constraint within the wind area. Considering the impact of thrust active adjustment on orbit entry parameters, a sequential convex optimization with two-step correction and relaxation factor adaptive adjustment method is adopted in second-stage to meet the orbit entry constraints. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is verified through three different trajectories. The simulation results show that the proposed method can limit aerodynamic constraints to less than 2800 Pa·rad and ensure that the orbital altitude deviation is less than 60 m without compromising capacity and energy optimization. © 2023 Editorial Department of Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1220 / 1227
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Zhang L, Li D, Cui N., Attitude control design for launch vehicle with appointed performance, Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology, 30, pp. 807-813, (2022)
  • [2] Yuan H, Li J, Song Z, Et al., Joint optimal control technology of launch vehicle flight load, Journal of Astronautics, 43, 10, pp. 1291-1301, (2022)
  • [3] Zhao Y, Wang Z, Song Z, Et al., Assessment on accelerometer based load relief control for launch vehicle, Journal of Astronautics, 43, pp. 393-402, (2022)
  • [4] Cui N, Guo D, Li K, Et al., A survey of numerical methods for aircraft trajectory optimization, Tactical Missile Technology, pp. 37-51, (2022)
  • [5] Siby S, Sreeja S., A review on trajectory optimisation techniques for launch vehicles during ascent phase, 2022 IEEE 19th India Council International Conference (INDICON), pp. 1-7, (2022)
  • [6] Ge Y, Liang Z, Lyv R, Et al., Terminal correction guidance of solid rocket based on modified Newton iteration method, Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology, 29, pp. 549-553, (2021)
  • [7] Liu F, Wang S, Yang M, Et al., Trajectory tracking of solid launch vehicle in ascending based on differential inclusion stabilization, Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology, 30, pp. 378-387, (2022)
  • [8] Zhu L, Wang Y, Wu Z, Et al., The Intelligent trajectory optimization of multistage rocket with Gauss pseudo-spectral method, Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 33, 1, pp. 290-303, (2022)
  • [9] Liu Y, Li C, Zhu X, Et al., Multi-scenario trajectory optimization for vertical takeoff and vertical landing vehicles using the Gauss pseudospectral method, Aerospace, 9, 11, pp. 1-18, (2022)
  • [10] Lofberg J., YALMIP: a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB, IEEE International Symposium on Computer Aided Control Systems Design, pp. 284-289, (2005)